右江民族医学院学报
右江民族醫學院學報
우강민족의학원학보
Journal of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities
2015年
5期
679-681
,共3页
磨牙推%微型种植体%远中移动磨牙
磨牙推%微型種植體%遠中移動磨牙
마아추%미형충식체%원중이동마아
Lokar maxillary molar distalization appliance%micro-implant anchorage%molar distoplace-ment
目的：评价磨牙推联合微型种植体支抗远中移动磨牙的快速性和有效性。方法选取2011年1月~2013年12月就诊的26例适合远中移动磨牙的安氏Ⅱ类错牙合患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组13例,使用磨牙推联合微型种植体支抗远中移动磨牙,对照组13例,单纯使用微型种植体支抗远中移动磨牙。术前术后取研究模型,拍摄头颅侧位片。结果实验组恢复Ⅰ类咬合平均需(3.94±0.39)个月,对照组为(5.37±0.45)个月,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)；实验组平均磨牙远中移动(5.05±0.52)mm,对照组为(4.75±0.24)mm,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论实验组较对照组能更快速有效远中移动磨牙,磨牙推联合微型种植体支抗技术值得临床推广。
目的：評價磨牙推聯閤微型種植體支抗遠中移動磨牙的快速性和有效性。方法選取2011年1月~2013年12月就診的26例適閤遠中移動磨牙的安氏Ⅱ類錯牙閤患者,隨機分為實驗組和對照組,實驗組13例,使用磨牙推聯閤微型種植體支抗遠中移動磨牙,對照組13例,單純使用微型種植體支抗遠中移動磨牙。術前術後取研究模型,拍攝頭顱側位片。結果實驗組恢複Ⅰ類咬閤平均需(3.94±0.39)箇月,對照組為(5.37±0.45)箇月,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)；實驗組平均磨牙遠中移動(5.05±0.52)mm,對照組為(4.75±0.24)mm,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論實驗組較對照組能更快速有效遠中移動磨牙,磨牙推聯閤微型種植體支抗技術值得臨床推廣。
목적：평개마아추연합미형충식체지항원중이동마아적쾌속성화유효성。방법선취2011년1월~2013년12월취진적26례괄합원중이동마아적안씨Ⅱ류착아합환자,수궤분위실험조화대조조,실험조13례,사용마아추연합미형충식체지항원중이동마아,대조조13례,단순사용미형충식체지항원중이동마아。술전술후취연구모형,박섭두로측위편。결과실험조회복Ⅰ류교합평균수(3.94±0.39)개월,대조조위(5.37±0.45)개월,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)；실험조평균마아원중이동(5.05±0.52)mm,대조조위(4.75±0.24)mm,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론실험조교대조조능경쾌속유효원중이동마아,마아추연합미형충식체지항기술치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the quickness and effectiveness of Lokar maxillary molar distalization appliance combined with micro - implant anchorage (MIA)in distoplacement of upper molars. Methods Twenty-six patients with Angle class II malocclusion who visited the Oral Outpatient Department of Guangxi Wuzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)Hospital from January 201 1 to December 2013 and were suitable for the molar distoplacement were chosen in this study.All the patients were randomly divided into an experi-ment group (n =13)and a control group (n =13)according to different treatment methods.Lokar molar dis-talization appliance combined with MIA was used in the experiment group for molar distalization,and the con-trol group used MIA alone for molar distalization.The pre- and post-operative research models were pre-pared and the lateral head extraoral radiographic examination was done. Results The average time to restore Angle classⅠocclusion relationship in the experiment group was (3.94 ± 0.39 )months,and in the control group it was (5.37 ±0.45)months,comparison of the two groups showed statistically significant difference (P <0.05).The average distance of molar distoplacement was (5.05 ±0.52)mm in the experiment group, and it was (4.75±0.24)mm in the control group,there was not significant difference (P >0.05). Conclu-sion The experiment group can distoplace upper molars more quickly and efficiently than the control group. Lokar maxillary molar distalization appliance with MIA deserves clinical recommendation.
