中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2015年
21期
3220-3222
,共3页
磁共振弥散加权成像%动态增强%磁共振成像%子宫肿瘤
磁共振瀰散加權成像%動態增彊%磁共振成像%子宮腫瘤
자공진미산가권성상%동태증강%자공진성상%자궁종류
Magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging%Dynamic enhancement%Magnetic resonance ima-ging%Uterine tumor
目的:研究磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI)和动态增强(DCE)成像在子宫内膜癌分期中的价值。方法选取子宫内膜癌患者200例,术前均给予磁共振 DWI 和磁共振 DCE 检查,比较两种检查方法对子宫内膜癌总体分期、肌层浸润的诊断价值。结果磁共振 DWI 评估肌层浸润整体准确率为91.5%(183/200),显著高于磁共振 DCE 的77.5%(155/200),差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.231,P <0.05);磁共振 DWI 浅肌层和深肌层浸润准确率、灵敏度以及阳性预测值均显著高于磁共振 DCE,两者差异均有统计学意义(χ2=9.283、8.231、9.021、8.927、8.142、9.405,均 P <0.05);与病理结果比较,磁共振 DWI 的 Kappa 值为0.807,磁共振DCE 的 Kappa 值为0.587。结论磁共振 DWI 与磁共振 DCE 比较,对子宫内膜癌肌层浸润的准确率和灵敏度均较高。
目的:研究磁共振瀰散加權成像(DWI)和動態增彊(DCE)成像在子宮內膜癌分期中的價值。方法選取子宮內膜癌患者200例,術前均給予磁共振 DWI 和磁共振 DCE 檢查,比較兩種檢查方法對子宮內膜癌總體分期、肌層浸潤的診斷價值。結果磁共振 DWI 評估肌層浸潤整體準確率為91.5%(183/200),顯著高于磁共振 DCE 的77.5%(155/200),差異有統計學意義(χ2=11.231,P <0.05);磁共振 DWI 淺肌層和深肌層浸潤準確率、靈敏度以及暘性預測值均顯著高于磁共振 DCE,兩者差異均有統計學意義(χ2=9.283、8.231、9.021、8.927、8.142、9.405,均 P <0.05);與病理結果比較,磁共振 DWI 的 Kappa 值為0.807,磁共振DCE 的 Kappa 值為0.587。結論磁共振 DWI 與磁共振 DCE 比較,對子宮內膜癌肌層浸潤的準確率和靈敏度均較高。
목적:연구자공진미산가권성상(DWI)화동태증강(DCE)성상재자궁내막암분기중적개치。방법선취자궁내막암환자200례,술전균급여자공진 DWI 화자공진 DCE 검사,비교량충검사방법대자궁내막암총체분기、기층침윤적진단개치。결과자공진 DWI 평고기층침윤정체준학솔위91.5%(183/200),현저고우자공진 DCE 적77.5%(155/200),차이유통계학의의(χ2=11.231,P <0.05);자공진 DWI 천기층화심기층침윤준학솔、령민도이급양성예측치균현저고우자공진 DCE,량자차이균유통계학의의(χ2=9.283、8.231、9.021、8.927、8.142、9.405,균 P <0.05);여병리결과비교,자공진 DWI 적 Kappa 치위0.807,자공진DCE 적 Kappa 치위0.587。결론자공진 DWI 여자공진 DCE 비교,대자궁내막암기층침윤적준학솔화령민도균교고。
Objective To study the value of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)and dynamic enhanced imaging (DCE)in endometrial carcinoma staging.Methods 200 cases with endometrial carcinoma were selected,DWI and DCE were given before operation.The diagnostic value of two kinds of examination methods for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in general and basic level was compared.Results The overall accuracy of muscle invasion of magnetic resonance DWI was 91.5%(183 /200),which was significantly higher than 77.5%(155 /200)of magnetic resonance DCE,the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =11.231,P <0.05 ).The accuracy,sensitivity and positive predictive value of the magnetic resonance DWI superficial and deep muscular layer were significantly higher than those of the magnetic resonance DCE (χ2 =9.283,8.231,9.021,8.927,8.142, 9.405,all P <0.05).Compared with pathological results,Kappa value of magnetic resonance DWI was 0.807,Kappa value of magnetic resonance DCE was 0.587.Conclusion Magnetic resonance DWI compared with magnetic reso-nance DCE,the accuracy and sensitivity of the infiltration of endometrial carcinoma was higher.