糖尿病新世界
糖尿病新世界
당뇨병신세계
Diabetes New World
2015年
18期
130-132
,共3页
胃肠癌%糖尿病%围术期护理%效果观察
胃腸癌%糖尿病%圍術期護理%效果觀察
위장암%당뇨병%위술기호리%효과관찰
Gastrointestinal Cancer%Diabetes%Perioperative Care%Effect Observation
目的 比较分析老年糖尿病合并胃肠癌患者常规护理与围术期护理的效果. 方法 选择该院治疗的100例老年糖尿病合并胃肠癌患者为研究对象,按照随机化原则将患者分为对照组和观察组,前组给予常规护理措施,后者给予个体化围术期整体护理措施,观察比较两组患者的护理效果.结果 两组患者下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间之间的差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);观察组患者手术前后的PBG值之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),对照组手术前后PBG值之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者低血糖反应及其并发症总发生率和护理满意度之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01),切口裂开和酮症酸中毒发生率之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05). 结论 对老年胃肠癌合并糖尿病患者进行围术期护理,治疗护理效果非常显著,值得临床推广应用.
目的 比較分析老年糖尿病閤併胃腸癌患者常規護理與圍術期護理的效果. 方法 選擇該院治療的100例老年糖尿病閤併胃腸癌患者為研究對象,按照隨機化原則將患者分為對照組和觀察組,前組給予常規護理措施,後者給予箇體化圍術期整體護理措施,觀察比較兩組患者的護理效果.結果 兩組患者下床活動時間、肛門排氣時間、住院時間之間的差異均有統計學意義(P均<0.05);觀察組患者手術前後的PBG值之間的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),對照組手術前後PBG值之間的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);兩組患者低血糖反應及其併髮癥總髮生率和護理滿意度之間的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05或0.01),切口裂開和酮癥痠中毒髮生率之間的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05). 結論 對老年胃腸癌閤併糖尿病患者進行圍術期護理,治療護理效果非常顯著,值得臨床推廣應用.
목적 비교분석노년당뇨병합병위장암환자상규호리여위술기호리적효과. 방법 선택해원치료적100례노년당뇨병합병위장암환자위연구대상,안조수궤화원칙장환자분위대조조화관찰조,전조급여상규호리조시,후자급여개체화위술기정체호리조시,관찰비교량조환자적호리효과.결과 량조환자하상활동시간、항문배기시간、주원시간지간적차이균유통계학의의(P균<0.05);관찰조환자수술전후적PBG치지간적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),대조조수술전후PBG치지간적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);량조환자저혈당반응급기병발증총발생솔화호리만의도지간적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05혹0.01),절구렬개화동증산중독발생솔지간적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05). 결론 대노년위장암합병당뇨병환자진행위술기호리,치료호리효과비상현저,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective Comparison of the effect of elderly diabetic patients with gastrointestinal cancer patients routine care and perioperative care. Methods Our hospital treated 100 cases of elderly diabetic patients with gastrointestinal cancer patients for the study, in accordance with the principle of randomization patients were divided into a control group and the observation group, former group received routine nursing care, after the group received individualized overall perioperative nursing care,care effect was observed between the two groups of patients. Results Two groups of patients ambulation time, flatus, the difference between the length of hospital stay were statistically significant (P<0.05);PBG value difference before and after surgery were observed between the groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05), the difference between the value of PBG was statistically significant (P<0.05) in the control group before and after surgery;hypoglycemia and their overall incidence of complications and nursing satisfaction between the two groups of patients with statistical significance(P<0.05 or 0.01),(P<0.05 or 0.01), wound dehiscence and ketoacidosis difference between the rate was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer and diabetes perioperative care, treatment and care effect is very significant, worthy of clinical application.
