CAJ | 학술논문

与清代阮元主编的《经籍籑诂》相比，2003年集体编撰出版的《故训汇纂》，在编排格式、检索便利、资料详备等方面，都有进步与创新。但我们不能因此而脱离历史实际去苛责阮元和他主编的《经籍籑诂》，甚至否定《经籍籑诂》的开创之功，以致对学术风气和学界后辈造成不良影响与误导。
여청대원원주편적《경적찬고》상비，2003년집체편찬출판적《고훈회찬》，재편배격식、검색편리、자료상비등방면，도유진보여창신。단아문불능인차이탈리역사실제거가책원원화타주편적《경적찬고》，심지부정《경적찬고》적개창지공，이치대학술풍기화학계후배조성불량영향여오도。
This paper speaks with facts to show that Prof. Fubang Zong parades his doing and creates public opinions improperly aboutGu Xun Hui Zuan, his compilation of ancient expository treatises. The way of false speculation on research makes a bad impact, misleading our academic community and younger generations. Prof. Zong made unwarranted charges against the predecessorJing Ji Zhuan Gu, compiled by Yuan Ruan in the Qing Dynasty, with revivalism. This critical attitude is casual and lfippant. Therefore, his conclusion does not conform to truths and should not be accepted in accordance with academic norms and characters of scholars. In addition to his negation ofJing Ji Zhuan Gu as an initiator and unassailable lead in this ifeld, Prof. Zong is trying to replace it with his own compilationGu Xun Hui Zuan by announcing his work is a "masterpiece".