农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
2015年
21期
285-294
,共10页
田文静%王俊国%宋娇娇%岳林芳%王亚利%包秋华%张和平%孟和毕力格
田文靜%王俊國%宋嬌嬌%嶽林芳%王亞利%包鞦華%張和平%孟和畢力格
전문정%왕준국%송교교%악림방%왕아리%포추화%장화평%맹화필력격
包埋%干燥%优化%微胶囊%植物乳杆菌LIP-1
包埋%榦燥%優化%微膠囊%植物乳桿菌LIP-1
포매%간조%우화%미효낭%식물유간균LIP-1
encapsulation%drying%optimization%microencapsulation%Lactobacillus plantarum LIP-1
为了探讨添加冷冻干燥保护剂对Lactobacillus.plantarum(L.plantarum)LIP-1微胶囊性能的影响,该试验以植物乳杆菌(L.plantarum) LIP-1微胶囊的包埋率和冻干存活率为指标,通过单因素及正交试验,筛选出最佳冷冻干燥保护剂,在此基础上将其添加到微胶囊中,观察对L.plantarum LIP-1微胶囊形态、释放性等性能的影响。试验结果表明冷冻干燥保护剂的最佳配方为质量分数分别为甘油2%、麦芽糖1%、L-半胱氨酸2%、乳糖2%,此时微胶囊的包埋率为67.60%,冻干存活率为83.80%;与未添加保护剂的空白对照组相比,添加适宜保护剂的微胶囊在表观形态、肠液释放性、耐胃酸性及在不同温度(4、20、37℃)下的耐贮藏性能均显著提高(P<0.05)。添加适宜保护剂的微胶囊表面更加光滑致密,粒径更小,约100μm(空白对照组约为150~200μm);在模拟肠液中,添加适宜保护剂的微胶囊完全释放仅需60 min,而空白对照组需要90 min才能释放完全;在耐胃酸性上,添加适宜保护剂的LIP-1微胶囊在120min后,活菌数才开始显著下降(P<0.05),150 min后,活菌数下降约30%;空白对照组在90 min后活菌数开始显著下降(P<0.05),150 min后,活菌数下降约44%;在4、20、37℃贮藏28 d后,加保护剂组的活菌数分别下降0.76、1.33、1.88 lg(cfu/g),而空白对照组的活菌数分别下降0.96、1.50、2.40 lg(cfu/g)。试验结果表明添加适宜的冷冻干燥保护剂可以提高L.plantarum LIP-1微胶囊的性能,为工业化生产中提高益生菌微胶囊的性能提供一定的理论和技术指导。
為瞭探討添加冷凍榦燥保護劑對Lactobacillus.plantarum(L.plantarum)LIP-1微膠囊性能的影響,該試驗以植物乳桿菌(L.plantarum) LIP-1微膠囊的包埋率和凍榦存活率為指標,通過單因素及正交試驗,篩選齣最佳冷凍榦燥保護劑,在此基礎上將其添加到微膠囊中,觀察對L.plantarum LIP-1微膠囊形態、釋放性等性能的影響。試驗結果錶明冷凍榦燥保護劑的最佳配方為質量分數分彆為甘油2%、麥芽糖1%、L-半胱氨痠2%、乳糖2%,此時微膠囊的包埋率為67.60%,凍榦存活率為83.80%;與未添加保護劑的空白對照組相比,添加適宜保護劑的微膠囊在錶觀形態、腸液釋放性、耐胃痠性及在不同溫度(4、20、37℃)下的耐貯藏性能均顯著提高(P<0.05)。添加適宜保護劑的微膠囊錶麵更加光滑緻密,粒徑更小,約100μm(空白對照組約為150~200μm);在模擬腸液中,添加適宜保護劑的微膠囊完全釋放僅需60 min,而空白對照組需要90 min纔能釋放完全;在耐胃痠性上,添加適宜保護劑的LIP-1微膠囊在120min後,活菌數纔開始顯著下降(P<0.05),150 min後,活菌數下降約30%;空白對照組在90 min後活菌數開始顯著下降(P<0.05),150 min後,活菌數下降約44%;在4、20、37℃貯藏28 d後,加保護劑組的活菌數分彆下降0.76、1.33、1.88 lg(cfu/g),而空白對照組的活菌數分彆下降0.96、1.50、2.40 lg(cfu/g)。試驗結果錶明添加適宜的冷凍榦燥保護劑可以提高L.plantarum LIP-1微膠囊的性能,為工業化生產中提高益生菌微膠囊的性能提供一定的理論和技術指導。
위료탐토첨가냉동간조보호제대Lactobacillus.plantarum(L.plantarum)LIP-1미효낭성능적영향,해시험이식물유간균(L.plantarum) LIP-1미효낭적포매솔화동간존활솔위지표,통과단인소급정교시험,사선출최가냉동간조보호제,재차기출상장기첨가도미효낭중,관찰대L.plantarum LIP-1미효낭형태、석방성등성능적영향。시험결과표명냉동간조보호제적최가배방위질량분수분별위감유2%、맥아당1%、L-반광안산2%、유당2%,차시미효낭적포매솔위67.60%,동간존활솔위83.80%;여미첨가보호제적공백대조조상비,첨가괄의보호제적미효낭재표관형태、장액석방성、내위산성급재불동온도(4、20、37℃)하적내저장성능균현저제고(P<0.05)。첨가괄의보호제적미효낭표면경가광활치밀,립경경소,약100μm(공백대조조약위150~200μm);재모의장액중,첨가괄의보호제적미효낭완전석방부수60 min,이공백대조조수요90 min재능석방완전;재내위산성상,첨가괄의보호제적LIP-1미효낭재120min후,활균수재개시현저하강(P<0.05),150 min후,활균수하강약30%;공백대조조재90 min후활균수개시현저하강(P<0.05),150 min후,활균수하강약44%;재4、20、37℃저장28 d후,가보호제조적활균수분별하강0.76、1.33、1.88 lg(cfu/g),이공백대조조적활균수분별하강0.96、1.50、2.40 lg(cfu/g)。시험결과표명첨가괄의적냉동간조보호제가이제고L.plantarum LIP-1미효낭적성능,위공업화생산중제고익생균미효낭적성능제공일정적이론화기술지도。
As all know, probiotics have many physiological functions, but the actual levels detected in probiotic products are often much lower due to adverse conditions during product storage, transportation, marketing and consumption. Many studies have shown that, microencapsulation techniques can provide protection against adverse conditions for probiotics. In order to enhance the storage stability of microcapsule, freeze drying is commonly used, but freeze-drying technique exposes the bacterial cells to additional stressful processing steps and the loss in viability of cells was observed. To prevent these adverse effects, cryoprotectants are commonly added to samples before freeze drying. In this study, we investigated the optimal ratio of cryoprotectants and the effect of cryoprotectants on the properties ofL. plantarum LIP-1 microcapsules. Single factor and orthogonal experimental design were used to study the influence of adding different types of cryoprotectants on microencapsulation efficiency (ME) and survival rate of LIP-1 during freeze-drying process. Based on those data, the effect of optimal cryoprotectants on the properties ofL. plantarum LIP-1 microcapsules was evaluated, such as surface morphology and microstructure by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), simulated gastricfluid (SGF) resistance, release characteristic in simulated intestinalfluid (SIF) and viability during four-week storage at different temperatures (4, 20 and 37°C). The results showed that the best cryoprotectant formulations were glycerol of 2%, maltose of 1%, L-cysteine of 2% and lactose of 2%, andbased on this formulation, the ME was 67.60% and the survival rate was 83.80%, which increased the number of living bactera after freeze drying significantly (P<0.05) compared with the blank (microcapsules without cryoprotectants, the ME and the survival rate were 70.5% and 56.41%, respectively). The microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants indicated a compact microcapsule structure and regular shape, and a finer and more dispersed substructure than the blank. The microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants had significantly faster release properties in SIF than the blank, for the microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants werecompletely released within 60 min, while the blank took 90 min to be fully released, which was maybe due to the difference in size and distribution status of those microcapsules. The size of microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants was smaller and the distribution was better than the blank, resulting in a larger specific surface area for enzyme activity, and the increase of the speed of disintegration. The microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants had a better SGF resistance than the blank. And in our study, free cells of LIP-1 were sensitive to low pH value, the viability began to decrease significantly (P<0.05) within 30 min, and they lost about 90% when exposed to acidic conditions for 120 min; the viability of microcapsules in blank began to decrease significantly (P<0.05) after 90 min, and lost about 44% when exposed to acidic conditions for 150 min; while the viability of microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants began to decrease significantly (P<0.05) after 120 min, and they lost about 30% when exposed to acidic conditions for 150 min. So the microencapsulation provided a significant protection forL. plantarum under acidic conditions, and cryoprotectants could enhance the SGF resistance of LIP-1 significantly. Maybe because the surface of microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants was denser, and had less aperture, it was likely to be more resistant to the penetration of SGF. The viability of microcapsules was significantly (P<0.05) higher than free cells during four- week storage at different temperatures (4, 20 and 37°C), while the viability of microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the blank. So the microencapsulation provided a significant protection forL. plantarumduring storage at different temperature, and the microcapsules with optimal cryoprotectants could significantly (P<0.05) increase the viability of LIP-1 during storage at different temperature, for the dense membrane formed around the microcapsules may provide effective protection by separating LIP-1 from harmful factors, such as air, moisture, light. In addition, the oxidative stability of L-cysteine was in favor of the storage of microcapsules. Therefore, the results indicate that the adding of optimal cryoprotectants can improve the properties ofL. plantarum LIP-1 microcapsules significantly, and also provide a theoretical basis and technical guidance for improving the properties of probiotic microcapsules during the commercial production.