中华创伤骨科杂志
中華創傷骨科雜誌
중화창상골과잡지
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2015年
10期
838-844
,共7页
魏星%王虎%庄岩%王鹏飞%温晓东%从雨轩%付亚辉%黄海%雷金来
魏星%王虎%莊巖%王鵬飛%溫曉東%從雨軒%付亞輝%黃海%雷金來
위성%왕호%장암%왕붕비%온효동%종우헌%부아휘%황해%뢰금래
胫骨%骨疾病,感染性%骨延长术%骨缺损
脛骨%骨疾病,感染性%骨延長術%骨缺損
경골%골질병,감염성%골연장술%골결손
Tibia%Bone diseases,infectious%Bone lengthening%Bone defect
目的 观察一期节段性清创骨搬运技术治疗胫骨感染性骨不连的治疗效果的.方法 回顾性分析2008年8月至2011年8月采用一期节段性清创骨搬运技术并创面开放治疗的15例胫骨感染性骨不连患者资料,男12例,女3例;平均年龄为36.9岁(20~55岁).患者采用局部节段性切除同时胫骨近侧干骺端截骨骨搬运及创面开放、停泊点清理植骨加压外固定支架调整等治疗,治疗过程分为4期:Ⅰ期:患者入组至初次手术前;Ⅱ期:初次手术骨搬运至停泊点;Ⅲ期:处理停泊点至拆外固定支架前;Ⅳ期:拆除外固定支架至术后2年.在4个治疗时期分别记录并发症、SF-36躯体综合功能评分(PCS)及心理综合评分(MCS)、行走时疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS).计算愈合指数并统计治疗过程中患者的手术次数. 结果 15例患者中1例随访至拆除外固定支架,14例(93%)患者随访至拆除外固定支架2年后.15例患者胫骨病灶处节段性切除后平均缺损长度为7.5 cm(3 ~12 cm).平均愈合指数为43.1 d/cm(33 ~62 d/cm).手术治疗时间平均为48周(30 ~ 62周).与Ⅰ期PCS评分、MCS评分和VAS评分比较,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期较低,Ⅳ期较高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);与Ⅳ期PCS评分、MCS评分和VAS评分比较,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期较低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).15例患者共接受了23次手术,平均为1.5次/例. 结论 一期节段性清创骨搬运技术治疗胫骨感染性骨不连,虽然治疗过程较长,并发症多,但可取得躯体及心理社会功能的恢复,具有手术次数少、带架时间短等优势,可彻底治愈骨感染.
目的 觀察一期節段性清創骨搬運技術治療脛骨感染性骨不連的治療效果的.方法 迴顧性分析2008年8月至2011年8月採用一期節段性清創骨搬運技術併創麵開放治療的15例脛骨感染性骨不連患者資料,男12例,女3例;平均年齡為36.9歲(20~55歲).患者採用跼部節段性切除同時脛骨近側榦骺耑截骨骨搬運及創麵開放、停泊點清理植骨加壓外固定支架調整等治療,治療過程分為4期:Ⅰ期:患者入組至初次手術前;Ⅱ期:初次手術骨搬運至停泊點;Ⅲ期:處理停泊點至拆外固定支架前;Ⅳ期:拆除外固定支架至術後2年.在4箇治療時期分彆記錄併髮癥、SF-36軀體綜閤功能評分(PCS)及心理綜閤評分(MCS)、行走時疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS).計算愈閤指數併統計治療過程中患者的手術次數. 結果 15例患者中1例隨訪至拆除外固定支架,14例(93%)患者隨訪至拆除外固定支架2年後.15例患者脛骨病竈處節段性切除後平均缺損長度為7.5 cm(3 ~12 cm).平均愈閤指數為43.1 d/cm(33 ~62 d/cm).手術治療時間平均為48週(30 ~ 62週).與Ⅰ期PCS評分、MCS評分和VAS評分比較,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期較低,Ⅳ期較高,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);與Ⅳ期PCS評分、MCS評分和VAS評分比較,Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期較低,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05).15例患者共接受瞭23次手術,平均為1.5次/例. 結論 一期節段性清創骨搬運技術治療脛骨感染性骨不連,雖然治療過程較長,併髮癥多,但可取得軀體及心理社會功能的恢複,具有手術次數少、帶架時間短等優勢,可徹底治愈骨感染.
목적 관찰일기절단성청창골반운기술치료경골감염성골불련적치료효과적.방법 회고성분석2008년8월지2011년8월채용일기절단성청창골반운기술병창면개방치료적15례경골감염성골불련환자자료,남12례,녀3례;평균년령위36.9세(20~55세).환자채용국부절단성절제동시경골근측간후단절골골반운급창면개방、정박점청리식골가압외고정지가조정등치료,치료과정분위4기:Ⅰ기:환자입조지초차수술전;Ⅱ기:초차수술골반운지정박점;Ⅲ기:처리정박점지탁외고정지가전;Ⅳ기:탁제외고정지가지술후2년.재4개치료시기분별기록병발증、SF-36구체종합공능평분(PCS)급심리종합평분(MCS)、행주시동통시각모의평분(VAS).계산유합지수병통계치료과정중환자적수술차수. 결과 15례환자중1례수방지탁제외고정지가,14례(93%)환자수방지탁제외고정지가2년후.15례환자경골병조처절단성절제후평균결손장도위7.5 cm(3 ~12 cm).평균유합지수위43.1 d/cm(33 ~62 d/cm).수술치료시간평균위48주(30 ~ 62주).여Ⅰ기PCS평분、MCS평분화VAS평분비교,Ⅱ기、Ⅲ기교저,Ⅳ기교고,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);여Ⅳ기PCS평분、MCS평분화VAS평분비교,Ⅱ기、Ⅲ기교저,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05).15례환자공접수료23차수술,평균위1.5차/례. 결론 일기절단성청창골반운기술치료경골감염성골불련,수연치료과정교장,병발증다,단가취득구체급심리사회공능적회복,구유수술차수소、대가시간단등우세,가철저치유골감염.
Objective To observe the clinical outcomes of primary segmental debridement and bone transport in the treatment of tibial infective nonunion.Methods From August 2008 to August 2011,we used primary segmental debridement and bone transport to treat 15 patients with tibial infective nonunion.They were 12 males and 3 females,with an average age of 36.9 years (from 20 to 55 years).Treatment procedures included segmental resection of the infection site,proximal tibial metaphyseal osteotomy,bone transport,opening infected wounds,bone graft and debridement for docking site.We divided the treatment process into 4 stages:stage Ⅰ (from admission till the primary operation),stage Ⅱ (from bone transport till the gap disappeared),stage Ⅲ (from docking site manoeuvre till removal of the external fixator),and stage Ⅳ (from removal of the external fixator till 2 years postoperation).Complications during the follow-up were recorded.Scores of physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) in SF-36 and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded during the 4 stages.Bone healing index and surgical frequency were calculated for each patient.Results Of all the patients,one was followed up until removal of the external fixator,and 14 of them (93%) until 2 years after removal of the external fixator.After debridement the tibial defects averaged 7.5 cm(from 3 to 12cm).The healing index was 43.1 d/cm (from 33 to 62 d/cm).The surgical treatment time averaged 48 weeks (from 30 to 62 weeks).The PCS,MCS and VAS scores of stage Ⅰ were significantly higher than those of stages Ⅱ & Ⅲ but significantly lower than those of stage Ⅳ (P < 0.05);the PCS,MCS and VAS scores of stage Ⅳ were significantly higher than those of stages Ⅱ & Ⅲ (P < 0.05).The 15 patients received a total of 23 operations,averaging 1.5 times per patient.Conclusions Although primary segmental debridement and bone transport is a time-consuming treatment of tibial infective nonunion which may lead to many complications,it can restore physical function and psychosocial health.In addition,the treatment has advantages of limited operation frequency,short fixation time and radical control of bone infection.