临床肿瘤学杂志
臨床腫瘤學雜誌
림상종류학잡지
Chinese Clinical Oncology
2015年
10期
913-917
,共5页
梅魁敏%刘秀峰%龚新%雷方蓉%张珏%李慧%姚琳%秦叔逵
梅魁敏%劉秀峰%龔新%雷方蓉%張玨%李慧%姚琳%秦叔逵
매괴민%류수봉%공신%뢰방용%장각%리혜%요림%진숙규
白蛋白结合型紫杉醇( Nab-P )%晚期胰腺癌%二线化疗
白蛋白結閤型紫杉醇( Nab-P )%晚期胰腺癌%二線化療
백단백결합형자삼순( Nab-P )%만기이선암%이선화료
Nab-paclitaxel(Nab-P)%Advanced pancreatic carcinoma%Second-line chemotherapy
目的:观察和评价白蛋白结合型紫杉醇( Nab?P )治疗吉西他滨一线化疗失败后晚期胰腺癌的疗效和安全性。方法回顾分析2012年5月至2015年5月接受Nab?P单药或联合方案( Nab?P 110 mg/m2静滴,第1、8天,21天为1周期)作为二线或二线以上治疗的晚期胰腺癌患者。分别采用RECIST 1?1版与NCI?CTC 4?0版标准评价近期疗效和毒副反应。采用Kaplan?Meier法进行生存分析。结果共纳入13例患者,其中9例可评价疗效和毒副反应。9例患者平均年龄为56?1岁,Nab?P 平均治疗2?27个周期。9例患者的疾病控制率( DCR)为55?6%,其中2例获PR,3例SD,4例PD;CA199较基线下降50%者4例(44?4%);中位疾病进展时间(TTP)为3?3个月(95%CI:2?4~4?2个月),中位生存时间(OS)为14?2个月(95%CI:2?8~25?6个月);3个月及6个月生存率分为88?9%和77?8%。常见毒副反应多为1~2级,主要为白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、乏力、恶心、呕吐等。结论 Nab?P对国人吉西他滨一线治疗失败后的晚期胰腺癌具有较好的疗效,且耐受性良好。
目的:觀察和評價白蛋白結閤型紫杉醇( Nab?P )治療吉西他濱一線化療失敗後晚期胰腺癌的療效和安全性。方法迴顧分析2012年5月至2015年5月接受Nab?P單藥或聯閤方案( Nab?P 110 mg/m2靜滴,第1、8天,21天為1週期)作為二線或二線以上治療的晚期胰腺癌患者。分彆採用RECIST 1?1版與NCI?CTC 4?0版標準評價近期療效和毒副反應。採用Kaplan?Meier法進行生存分析。結果共納入13例患者,其中9例可評價療效和毒副反應。9例患者平均年齡為56?1歲,Nab?P 平均治療2?27箇週期。9例患者的疾病控製率( DCR)為55?6%,其中2例穫PR,3例SD,4例PD;CA199較基線下降50%者4例(44?4%);中位疾病進展時間(TTP)為3?3箇月(95%CI:2?4~4?2箇月),中位生存時間(OS)為14?2箇月(95%CI:2?8~25?6箇月);3箇月及6箇月生存率分為88?9%和77?8%。常見毒副反應多為1~2級,主要為白細胞減少、中性粒細胞減少、乏力、噁心、嘔吐等。結論 Nab?P對國人吉西他濱一線治療失敗後的晚期胰腺癌具有較好的療效,且耐受性良好。
목적:관찰화평개백단백결합형자삼순( Nab?P )치료길서타빈일선화료실패후만기이선암적료효화안전성。방법회고분석2012년5월지2015년5월접수Nab?P단약혹연합방안( Nab?P 110 mg/m2정적,제1、8천,21천위1주기)작위이선혹이선이상치료적만기이선암환자。분별채용RECIST 1?1판여NCI?CTC 4?0판표준평개근기료효화독부반응。채용Kaplan?Meier법진행생존분석。결과공납입13례환자,기중9례가평개료효화독부반응。9례환자평균년령위56?1세,Nab?P 평균치료2?27개주기。9례환자적질병공제솔( DCR)위55?6%,기중2례획PR,3례SD,4례PD;CA199교기선하강50%자4례(44?4%);중위질병진전시간(TTP)위3?3개월(95%CI:2?4~4?2개월),중위생존시간(OS)위14?2개월(95%CI:2?8~25?6개월);3개월급6개월생존솔분위88?9%화77?8%。상견독부반응다위1~2급,주요위백세포감소、중성립세포감소、핍력、악심、구토등。결론 Nab?P대국인길서타빈일선치료실패후적만기이선암구유교호적료효,차내수성량호。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nab?paclitaxel ( Nab?P ) on patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma who failed to gemcitabine first?line therapy. Methods Patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma who have failed to first?line therapy from May 2012 to May 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients received Nab?P?based monotherapy or combina?tion regimens( Nab?P 110 mg/m2 iv, d1 ,d8 , every 3 weeks) as second or more line treatments. The efficacy and safety were evaluated by RECIST 1?1 and NCI?CTC 4?0 criteria. Median time to disease progression(TTP) and overall survival(OS) were analyzed by Kap?lan?Meier method. Results Thirteen patients failured to gemcitabine?based regimen were enrolled and 9 of them were evaluatable. The median age was 56?1 years, and the average treatment cycle was 2?27. The disease control rate( DCR) was 55?6%, including 2 cases of PR, 3 cases of SD and 4 cases of PD. The number of patients with elevated baseline CA19?9 had>50% decline was 4(44?4%). The median TTP was 3?0 months(95%CI: 2?4?4?2 months) and the median OS was 14?2 months(95%CI: 2?8?25?6 months).The 3?month and 6?month survival rate was 88?9% and 77?8%, respectively. The major treatment?related side effects including leucopenia, neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and etc. were mainly in grade 1?2. Conclusion Nab?paclitaxe is effective and tolerable in Chi?nese advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients who have progressed on gemcitabine first?line therapy.