成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)
成都理工大學學報(社會科學版)
성도리공대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology Social Sciences
2015年
6期
23-28
,共6页
短缩的二行为犯%目的%主观的违法要素%共犯
短縮的二行為犯%目的%主觀的違法要素%共犯
단축적이행위범%목적%주관적위법요소%공범
incompletely two-conduct crime%aim%subjective illegality element%joint crime
在我国刑法中实质的故意概念之下,短缩的二行为犯中的“目的”无法纳入到故意之中,是和故意并列的主观要素。短缩的二行为犯中的“目的”应例外地被承认为主观的违法要素。短缩的二行为犯的共犯问题应依据客观违法论“违法是客观连带的,责任是主观个别的”的基本立场加以解决。
在我國刑法中實質的故意概唸之下,短縮的二行為犯中的“目的”無法納入到故意之中,是和故意併列的主觀要素。短縮的二行為犯中的“目的”應例外地被承認為主觀的違法要素。短縮的二行為犯的共犯問題應依據客觀違法論“違法是客觀連帶的,責任是主觀箇彆的”的基本立場加以解決。
재아국형법중실질적고의개념지하,단축적이행위범중적“목적”무법납입도고의지중,시화고의병렬적주관요소。단축적이행위범중적“목적”응예외지피승인위주관적위법요소。단축적이행위범적공범문제응의거객관위법론“위법시객관련대적,책임시주관개별적”적기본립장가이해결。
Under the conception of the virtual intetion in the criminal law,the aim in the incompletely two-conduct crime can’t be included in the intetion and it is a subjective element which is parallel with intetion.The aim in the incompletely two-conduct crime should be admitted as a subjective illigality element.Its joint crime problem should be solved by the basic position of the theory of objective illegality.