成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）
成都理工大學學報（社會科學版）
성도리공대학학보（사회과학판）
Journal of Chengdu University of Technology Social Sciences
2015年
6期
8-13
,共6页
庭外言论%控辩对抗%辩审对抗%界限
庭外言論%控辯對抗%辯審對抗%界限
정외언론%공변대항%변심대항%계한
extrajudicial statements%confrontation between accuser and defender%confrontation between defender and judge%boundaries
北京律协对李天一案六位律师的处分唤起了法学界对律师庭外言论问题的探讨，全国律协的两个修订草案更是将这一问题推向风口浪尖。作为一种辩护策略，律师的庭外言论可以分为控辩对抗模式和辩审对抗模式，前者主要围绕案件的实体问题，后者更加侧重案件的程序问题。这两种模式的形成是中国司法语境的特定产物。对于控辩对抗模式，原则上应当禁止其庭外言论，通过诉讼化的方式将其纳入庭审对抗的范围，对于违规的律师通过行业自治予以处分；对于辩审对抗模式，若满足三个维度的约束，可以在一定程度上允许律师发表庭外言论寻求救济。
北京律協對李天一案六位律師的處分喚起瞭法學界對律師庭外言論問題的探討，全國律協的兩箇脩訂草案更是將這一問題推嚮風口浪尖。作為一種辯護策略，律師的庭外言論可以分為控辯對抗模式和辯審對抗模式，前者主要圍繞案件的實體問題，後者更加側重案件的程序問題。這兩種模式的形成是中國司法語境的特定產物。對于控辯對抗模式，原則上應噹禁止其庭外言論，通過訴訟化的方式將其納入庭審對抗的範圍，對于違規的律師通過行業自治予以處分；對于辯審對抗模式，若滿足三箇維度的約束，可以在一定程度上允許律師髮錶庭外言論尋求救濟。
북경률협대리천일안육위률사적처분환기료법학계대률사정외언론문제적탐토，전국률협적량개수정초안경시장저일문제추향풍구랑첨。작위일충변호책략，률사적정외언론가이분위공변대항모식화변심대항모식，전자주요위요안건적실체문제，후자경가측중안건적정서문제。저량충모식적형성시중국사법어경적특정산물。대우공변대항모식，원칙상응당금지기정외언론，통과소송화적방식장기납입정심대항적범위，대우위규적률사통과행업자치여이처분；대우변심대항모식，약만족삼개유도적약속，가이재일정정도상윤허률사발표정외언론심구구제。
The punishment made by Beijing Lawyer Association on the six lawyers in the case of Li evokes a highly debate about the lawyers’extrajudicial statements.Furthermore,two amendments issued by the National Lawyers Association put this problem to the forefront.As a defensive strategy, extrajudicial statements can be divided into two modes.The confrontation between accuser and defender mainly concerns the substantive problem,while the confrontation between defender and judge focuses more attention on procedural issues.The formation of these two modes is the product of our judicial practice. The former mode should be prohibited on the whole because it is judicial proceedings in the trial.If lawyers violate,the lawyer association may punish them.The latter mode could be allowed in some degree if it meets three conditions.
