中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
China Modern Medicine
2015年
28期
79-81
,共3页
黄常盛%吕正涛%熊伟%王剑%何松
黃常盛%呂正濤%熊偉%王劍%何鬆
황상성%려정도%웅위%왕검%하송
胫腓骨远端骨折%双钢板固定%单切口%双切口
脛腓骨遠耑骨摺%雙鋼闆固定%單切口%雙切口
경비골원단골절%쌍강판고정%단절구%쌍절구
Distal tibial fractures%Double plate fixation%Single incision%Double incision
目的:探讨单切口双钢板固定治疗胫腓骨远端骨折的临床疗效。方法选取2012年6月~2014年4月闭合性胫腓骨远端骨折患者64例,按患者的意愿分为观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=30)。观察组行单切口双钢板固定术,对照组行双切口双钢板固定术,比较两组的治疗效果。结果观察组平均手术时间、术中出血量和骨折愈合时间与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.805,P>0.05;t=0.490,P>0.05;t=0.974,P>0.05)。观察组平均住院天数显著少于对照组(t=3.755,P<0.05)。观察组术后切口延迟愈合、皮肤坏死、合并感染例数和非计划再次手术例数均显著少于对照组(字2=6.673,P<0.01;字2=4.338,P<0.05;字2=4.051,P<0.05;字2=5.334,P<0.05)。结论单切口双钢板固定术治疗胫腓骨远端骨折的骨折愈合效果佳,可缩短住院天数,切口延迟愈合、皮肤坏死、合并感染、再次手术等的发生率低,是理想的治疗方法。
目的:探討單切口雙鋼闆固定治療脛腓骨遠耑骨摺的臨床療效。方法選取2012年6月~2014年4月閉閤性脛腓骨遠耑骨摺患者64例,按患者的意願分為觀察組(n=34)和對照組(n=30)。觀察組行單切口雙鋼闆固定術,對照組行雙切口雙鋼闆固定術,比較兩組的治療效果。結果觀察組平均手術時間、術中齣血量和骨摺愈閤時間與對照組比較,差異無統計學意義(t=1.805,P>0.05;t=0.490,P>0.05;t=0.974,P>0.05)。觀察組平均住院天數顯著少于對照組(t=3.755,P<0.05)。觀察組術後切口延遲愈閤、皮膚壞死、閤併感染例數和非計劃再次手術例數均顯著少于對照組(字2=6.673,P<0.01;字2=4.338,P<0.05;字2=4.051,P<0.05;字2=5.334,P<0.05)。結論單切口雙鋼闆固定術治療脛腓骨遠耑骨摺的骨摺愈閤效果佳,可縮短住院天數,切口延遲愈閤、皮膚壞死、閤併感染、再次手術等的髮生率低,是理想的治療方法。
목적:탐토단절구쌍강판고정치료경비골원단골절적림상료효。방법선취2012년6월~2014년4월폐합성경비골원단골절환자64례,안환자적의원분위관찰조(n=34)화대조조(n=30)。관찰조행단절구쌍강판고정술,대조조행쌍절구쌍강판고정술,비교량조적치료효과。결과관찰조평균수술시간、술중출혈량화골절유합시간여대조조비교,차이무통계학의의(t=1.805,P>0.05;t=0.490,P>0.05;t=0.974,P>0.05)。관찰조평균주원천수현저소우대조조(t=3.755,P<0.05)。관찰조술후절구연지유합、피부배사、합병감염례수화비계화재차수술례수균현저소우대조조(자2=6.673,P<0.01;자2=4.338,P<0.05;자2=4.051,P<0.05;자2=5.334,P<0.05)。결론단절구쌍강판고정술치료경비골원단골절적골절유합효과가,가축단주원천수,절구연지유합、피부배사、합병감염、재차수술등적발생솔저,시이상적치료방법。
Objective To investigate clinical efficacy of single-incision double plate fixation in the treatment of distal tibial fractures. Methods 64 patients with distal tibial fractures in our hospital from June 2012 to April 2014 were se-lected and divided into observation group (n=34) and control group (n=30).Observation group was given single-incision double plate fixation,while control group was given double-incisions double plate fixation.Effect between two groups was compared. Results The mean operative time,average blood loss and healing time between two groups had no statis-tically significant difference (P>0.05).The hospitalization time of observation group was lower than that of control group (P<0.05).The number of the wound healing,skin necrosis,infection and cases of non-planned reoperation of observation group was significantly less than that of control group respectively(P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of distal tibial fractures,single-incision double plate fixation has a better healing effect and shorten the hospitalization time.The cases of wound healing,skin necrosis,infection and re-operation are less and it is an ideal treatment method.