重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
Chongqing Medicine
2015年
28期
3935-3937
,共3页
黄海霞%兰玉燕%潘兰兰%蔡炜%刘敏%吴亚菲
黃海霞%蘭玉燕%潘蘭蘭%蔡煒%劉敏%吳亞菲
황해하%란옥연%반란란%채위%류민%오아비
种植修复%牙周炎%临床指标%细胞因子
種植脩複%牙週炎%臨床指標%細胞因子
충식수복%아주염%림상지표%세포인자
implant%periodontitis%clinical index%cytokine
目的:探讨种植修复对慢性牙周炎患者的近期疗效。方法60例牙列缺损慢性牙周炎患者共植入75枚种植体,另选择50例植入67枚种植体牙周健康牙列缺损患者作为对照组。比较两组改良龈沟出血指数(mSBI)、牙龈乳头指数(PIS)、改良菌斑指数(mPLI)、牙周探诊深度(PD);并检测两组种植体周围龈沟液白细胞介素(IL)‐2、IL‐8水平。结果研究组75枚种植体中有2枚自行脱落,种植体松动度0,种植体存留率为97.3%;对照组无种植体脱落,种植体松动度0,种植体存留率为100%,两组种植体存留率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.737,P=0.098)。术后6个月研究组 mSBI 、PIS 、mPLI 、PD 与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术前后研究组龈沟 IL‐2、IL‐8水平均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论慢性牙周炎患者进行种植修复能够获得满意的近期疗效,且未增加种植体周围炎的风险,但其远期疗效尚待证实。
目的:探討種植脩複對慢性牙週炎患者的近期療效。方法60例牙列缺損慢性牙週炎患者共植入75枚種植體,另選擇50例植入67枚種植體牙週健康牙列缺損患者作為對照組。比較兩組改良齦溝齣血指數(mSBI)、牙齦乳頭指數(PIS)、改良菌斑指數(mPLI)、牙週探診深度(PD);併檢測兩組種植體週圍齦溝液白細胞介素(IL)‐2、IL‐8水平。結果研究組75枚種植體中有2枚自行脫落,種植體鬆動度0,種植體存留率為97.3%;對照組無種植體脫落,種植體鬆動度0,種植體存留率為100%,兩組種植體存留率比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=2.737,P=0.098)。術後6箇月研究組 mSBI 、PIS 、mPLI 、PD 與對照組相比差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);手術前後研究組齦溝 IL‐2、IL‐8水平均顯著高于對照組(P<0.05)。結論慢性牙週炎患者進行種植脩複能夠穫得滿意的近期療效,且未增加種植體週圍炎的風險,但其遠期療效尚待證實。
목적:탐토충식수복대만성아주염환자적근기료효。방법60례아렬결손만성아주염환자공식입75매충식체,령선택50례식입67매충식체아주건강아렬결손환자작위대조조。비교량조개량간구출혈지수(mSBI)、아간유두지수(PIS)、개량균반지수(mPLI)、아주탐진심도(PD);병검측량조충식체주위간구액백세포개소(IL)‐2、IL‐8수평。결과연구조75매충식체중유2매자행탈락,충식체송동도0,충식체존류솔위97.3%;대조조무충식체탈락,충식체송동도0,충식체존류솔위100%,량조충식체존류솔비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=2.737,P=0.098)。술후6개월연구조 mSBI 、PIS 、mPLI 、PD 여대조조상비차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);수술전후연구조간구 IL‐2、IL‐8수평균현저고우대조조(P<0.05)。결론만성아주염환자진행충식수복능구획득만의적근기료효,차미증가충식체주위염적풍험,단기원기료효상대증실。
Objective To explore the short‐term effect of chronic periodontitis patients after implant treatment .Methods Selected 60 cases of tooth loss in chronic periodontitis patients as research group ,a total of 75 implants were placed ,and 50 cases of periodontal healthy teeth missing patients as control group ,a total of 67 implants were placed .Compared two groups of modification sulcus bleeding index(mBII) ,papilla index score(PIS) ,modification plaque index(mPLI) and probing depth(PD) 6 months after op‐eration ,and detected implant sulcular fluid IL‐2 ,IL‐8 content in two groups before and after operation .Results Research group 75 implants had 2 off on their own ,implant loosening degrees 0 ,implant survival rate was 97 .3% ;the control group had no implant failure ,implant loosening of implant survival rate was 100% ,two groups of implant survival rate was no significant difference(χ2 =2 .737 ,P= 0 .098) .The mSBI ,PIS ,mPLI ,PD in research group and control group had no statistically significant(P > 0 .05) .Re‐search group sulcular fluid IL‐2 ,IL‐8 content was significantly higher than those in control group before and after the operation (P< 0 .05) .Conclusion The short‐term effect of implant treatment in chronic periodontitis patients is satisfactory ,without increas‐ing the risk of peri‐implantitis ,and worth of clinical promotion .