CAJ | 학술논문

目的：了解疾病预防控制机构卫生应急专业人员的培训需求，为制订培训工作规划提供依据。方法采用问卷调查的形式，于2014年7月对参加2014年河南省疾病预防控制系统卫生应急培训班的66名专业人员进行调查，调查内容包括培训内容、形式、时间、师资、考核形式和结业方式6个方面。结果41名（62．12％）选择的培训内容为“各类突发事件的卫生应急处置”，培训形式为“案例分析”。不同性别、文化程度、职称、人员类别和供职机构人员选择不同“培训内容”和“培训形式”的构成比例，差异均无统计学意义（ P＞0．05）。52名（78．79％）认为每年培训1～2次比较合适，53名（80．30％）认为每次培训2～3 d比较合适。选择“国内专家”担任培训老师的比例最高（56．06％），其次为“卫生应急管理干部”（34．85％）和“国外专家”（6．06％）；选择“高校教授”的比例最低（3．03％）。71．21％（47名）选择“模拟处理实际问题”作为考核形式，71．21％（47名）选择“授予学分”作为结业方式。“性别”和“供职机构”为选择不同结业方式的重要影响因素（P＜0．05）。结论卫生应急培训应以需求为导向，选择适当的培训内容和形式，以提高培训质量和效果，提升专业人员的业务能力。
목적：료해질병예방공제궤구위생응급전업인원적배훈수구，위제정배훈공작규화제공의거。방법채용문권조사적형식，우2014년7월대삼가2014년하남성질병예방공제계통위생응급배훈반적66명전업인원진행조사，조사내용포괄배훈내용、형식、시간、사자、고핵형식화결업방식6개방면。결과41명（62．12％）선택적배훈내용위“각류돌발사건적위생응급처치”，배훈형식위“안례분석”。불동성별、문화정도、직칭、인원유별화공직궤구인원선택불동“배훈내용”화“배훈형식”적구성비례，차이균무통계학의의（ P＞0．05）。52명（78．79％）인위매년배훈1～2차비교합괄，53명（80．30％）인위매차배훈2～3 d비교합괄。선택“국내전가”담임배훈로사적비례최고（56．06％），기차위“위생응급관리간부”（34．85％）화“국외전가”（6．06％）；선택“고교교수”적비례최저（3．03％）。71．21％（47명）선택“모의처리실제문제”작위고핵형식，71．21％（47명）선택“수여학분”작위결업방식。“성별”화“공직궤구”위선택불동결업방식적중요영향인소（P＜0．05）。결론위생응급배훈응이수구위도향，선택괄당적배훈내용화형식，이제고배훈질량화효과，제승전업인원적업무능력。
Objective To investigate the training needs of health emergency professionals in centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) ,and to provide evidence for making training plan .Methods Totally 66 health emergency professionals who par‐ticipated in health emergency training class of CDC were surveyed with questionnaires in July ,2014 .The items included training content ,mode ,time ,teachers ,assessment forms and graduation way .Results Forty one persons (62 .12% of all subjects) selected health emergency disposal of all kinds of emergencies as the training contents ,and case analysis as the training mode .There were no statistical significances for the differences of the proportions of the professional staffs between different genders ,education levels ,ti‐tles ,categories and agencies (P>0 .05) .52 persons (78 .79% ) considered that training frequency of 1-2 times per year was appro‐priate ,and 53 persons (80 .30% ) considered that the most appropriate duration for each training was 2 -3 days .Domestic experts as a training teacher had the highest proportion (56 .06% ) ,followed by "health emergency management cadres" (34 .85% ) ,and "foreign experts" (6 .06% ) .The proportion of selecting university professor as a training teacher was lowest (3 .03% ) .71 .21% (47 persons) selected analog dealing with practical problems as assessment form ,and 71 .21% (47 persons) selected granting credits as graduation way .Gender and agencies were two important influencing factors for selecting different graduation ways (P< 0 .05) . Conclusion Training program of health emergency should be made according to the training needs .Appropriate training content and form should be selected in order to improve the quality and effectiveness of training ,and to improve the ability of the health e‐mergency professionals .