国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2015年
20期
2963-2964,2966
,共3页
王静%刘杰%王淑贞%马萍
王靜%劉傑%王淑貞%馬萍
왕정%류걸%왕숙정%마평
妊娠晚期%B群链球菌%荧光PCR技术%耐药性
妊娠晚期%B群鏈毬菌%熒光PCR技術%耐藥性
임신만기%B군련구균%형광PCR기술%내약성
late pregnancy%group B streptococcus%fluorescence PCR technology%resistance
目的:对比荧光定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术和细菌培养法在徐州地区妊娠晚期妇女B群链球菌(GBS )定植筛查中的应用,并了解GBS的耐药情况。方法采集本地区妊娠晚期妇女的阴道拭子和肛门拭子,同时进行荧光PCR检测和细菌培养法检测,比较分析两种方法的各项性能指标。对细菌培养法阳性者做药敏试验。结果484例标本中,荧光 PCR技术检测GBS阳性53例,阳性率11.0%,灵敏度为100.0%;细菌培养法检测GBS阳性31例,阳性率6.4%,灵敏度59.6%。两组之间阳性率和灵敏度比较差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。药敏结果显示青霉素、头孢曲松、万古霉素的敏感率是100.0%;红霉素、克林霉素、左氧氟沙星的耐药率为71.0%、64.5%和58.1%。结论徐州地区妊娠晚期妇女GBS的定植率不低,PCR是一种更为快速的具有较高特异性和敏感度的方法。临床应积极开展GBS的常规检测。本地区GBS对红霉素和克林霉素耐药率较高,临床应重视抗菌药物的合理应用,避免更多GBS耐药株的出现。
目的:對比熒光定量聚閤酶鏈反應(PCR)技術和細菌培養法在徐州地區妊娠晚期婦女B群鏈毬菌(GBS )定植篩查中的應用,併瞭解GBS的耐藥情況。方法採集本地區妊娠晚期婦女的陰道拭子和肛門拭子,同時進行熒光PCR檢測和細菌培養法檢測,比較分析兩種方法的各項性能指標。對細菌培養法暘性者做藥敏試驗。結果484例標本中,熒光 PCR技術檢測GBS暘性53例,暘性率11.0%,靈敏度為100.0%;細菌培養法檢測GBS暘性31例,暘性率6.4%,靈敏度59.6%。兩組之間暘性率和靈敏度比較差異均有統計學意義( P<0.05)。藥敏結果顯示青黴素、頭孢麯鬆、萬古黴素的敏感率是100.0%;紅黴素、剋林黴素、左氧氟沙星的耐藥率為71.0%、64.5%和58.1%。結論徐州地區妊娠晚期婦女GBS的定植率不低,PCR是一種更為快速的具有較高特異性和敏感度的方法。臨床應積極開展GBS的常規檢測。本地區GBS對紅黴素和剋林黴素耐藥率較高,臨床應重視抗菌藥物的閤理應用,避免更多GBS耐藥株的齣現。
목적:대비형광정량취합매련반응(PCR)기술화세균배양법재서주지구임신만기부녀B군련구균(GBS )정식사사중적응용,병료해GBS적내약정황。방법채집본지구임신만기부녀적음도식자화항문식자,동시진행형광PCR검측화세균배양법검측,비교분석량충방법적각항성능지표。대세균배양법양성자주약민시험。결과484례표본중,형광 PCR기술검측GBS양성53례,양성솔11.0%,령민도위100.0%;세균배양법검측GBS양성31례,양성솔6.4%,령민도59.6%。량조지간양성솔화령민도비교차이균유통계학의의( P<0.05)。약민결과현시청매소、두포곡송、만고매소적민감솔시100.0%;홍매소、극림매소、좌양불사성적내약솔위71.0%、64.5%화58.1%。결론서주지구임신만기부녀GBS적정식솔불저,PCR시일충경위쾌속적구유교고특이성화민감도적방법。림상응적겁개전GBS적상규검측。본지구GBS대홍매소화극림매소내약솔교고,림상응중시항균약물적합리응용,피면경다GBS내약주적출현。
Objective To compare the colonization rates of group B streptococcus (GBS) detected by using fluorescent PCR and bacterial culture in late pregnant women in Xuzhou area and analyze the drug resistance of GBS .Methods The fluorescence PCR assay and bacterial culture assay for GBS were both performed for the late‐pregnant women′s vaginal swabs and anal swabs samples which were collected in this area .The diagnostic efficiency were compared between the two methods .Then the drug sensitivity test were performed for stains isolated for the bacteria culture .Results Among the 484 spcimens ,53 cases were positive detected by u‐sing fluorescent PCR ,and the positive rate was 11 .0% ,the sensitivity was 100 .0% .31 cases were detected positive by using bacte‐rial culture ,and the positive rate was 6 .4% ,the sensitivity was 59 .6% .There were statistically significant differences between the positive rate and the sensitivity of the two groups(P<0 .05) .The drug sensitivity test showed that the sensitive rates were 100 .0%to penicillin ,ceftriaxone ,vancomycin .The resistance rates to erythromycin ,clindamycin ,levofloxacin were 71 .0% ,64 .5% and 58 .1% ,respectively .Conclusion The screening rate of GBS in late pregnant women is not low in Xuzhou area .PCR is a more rap‐id ,specificific and sensitive method .Routine detection of GBS should carried out by using the method of fluorescent PCR .Resistance rate of GBS to erythromycin and clindamycin were high in Xuzhou area .More attention should be paid to the rational use of antibi‐otics to prevent drug‐resistant producing in strains of GBS .