中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2015年
20期
3092-3094
,共3页
婴儿,早产%喂饲方法%婴儿配方
嬰兒,早產%餵飼方法%嬰兒配方
영인,조산%위사방법%영인배방
Infant,premature%Feeding methods%Infant formula
目的：比较不同方式喂养后早产儿体质量、身高、头围的变化，分析其优劣性。方法选取早产儿260例作为研究对象，按照随机数字表法分为四组，A 组：早产儿配方奶喂养80例；B 组：纯母乳喂养组60例；C 组：普通足月儿配方奶喂养60例；D 组：早产儿配方奶混合母乳喂养60例。所有患儿均在出生后12～24 h 开始喂养。将患儿的体质量、身高、头围以及追赶上足月儿的时间作为评价指标。结果患儿纠正40周胎龄后，B 组体质量、身高、头围均高于其他组，C 组最低，差异有统计学意义（F ＝3．563，P ＜0．05）。纠正胎龄1、3、6个月后，A 组体质量、身高以及头围指标高于其他喂养组，D 组水平次之，C 组水平最低，差异有统计学意义（F ＝3．011、2．853、2．779，均 P ＜0．05）。到6个月时，A 组追赶最快，达到38．8％（31／80），差异有统计学意义（χ2＝29．149，P ＜0．05），其他时段，A 组追赶例数较多，但差异无统计学意义。结论对于早产儿，采用早产儿专用配方奶粉或者早产儿配方奶与母乳的交替喂养的方式优于纯母乳喂养和普通足月儿奶粉喂养，可以在保证患儿的营养需求的同时，缩短追赶足月儿时间，促进婴儿的健康。
目的：比較不同方式餵養後早產兒體質量、身高、頭圍的變化，分析其優劣性。方法選取早產兒260例作為研究對象，按照隨機數字錶法分為四組，A 組：早產兒配方奶餵養80例；B 組：純母乳餵養組60例；C 組：普通足月兒配方奶餵養60例；D 組：早產兒配方奶混閤母乳餵養60例。所有患兒均在齣生後12～24 h 開始餵養。將患兒的體質量、身高、頭圍以及追趕上足月兒的時間作為評價指標。結果患兒糾正40週胎齡後，B 組體質量、身高、頭圍均高于其他組，C 組最低，差異有統計學意義（F ＝3．563，P ＜0．05）。糾正胎齡1、3、6箇月後，A 組體質量、身高以及頭圍指標高于其他餵養組，D 組水平次之，C 組水平最低，差異有統計學意義（F ＝3．011、2．853、2．779，均 P ＜0．05）。到6箇月時，A 組追趕最快，達到38．8％（31／80），差異有統計學意義（χ2＝29．149，P ＜0．05），其他時段，A 組追趕例數較多，但差異無統計學意義。結論對于早產兒，採用早產兒專用配方奶粉或者早產兒配方奶與母乳的交替餵養的方式優于純母乳餵養和普通足月兒奶粉餵養，可以在保證患兒的營養需求的同時，縮短追趕足月兒時間，促進嬰兒的健康。
목적：비교불동방식위양후조산인체질량、신고、두위적변화，분석기우렬성。방법선취조산인260례작위연구대상，안조수궤수자표법분위사조，A 조：조산인배방내위양80례；B 조：순모유위양조60례；C 조：보통족월인배방내위양60례；D 조：조산인배방내혼합모유위양60례。소유환인균재출생후12～24 h 개시위양。장환인적체질량、신고、두위이급추간상족월인적시간작위평개지표。결과환인규정40주태령후，B 조체질량、신고、두위균고우기타조，C 조최저，차이유통계학의의（F ＝3．563，P ＜0．05）。규정태령1、3、6개월후，A 조체질량、신고이급두위지표고우기타위양조，D 조수평차지，C 조수평최저，차이유통계학의의（F ＝3．011、2．853、2．779，균 P ＜0．05）。도6개월시，A 조추간최쾌，체도38．8％（31／80），차이유통계학의의（χ2＝29．149，P ＜0．05），기타시단，A 조추간례수교다，단차이무통계학의의。결론대우조산인，채용조산인전용배방내분혹자조산인배방내여모유적교체위양적방식우우순모유위양화보통족월인내분위양，가이재보증환인적영양수구적동시，축단추간족월인시간，촉진영인적건강。
Objective To compare the body weight,height,head circumference of premature babies fed by different ways,and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages.Methods 260 premature infants were selected as the research subjects,according to random number table,they were divided into four groups.Group A:premature infant formula feeding,80 cases;Group B:pure breast feeding group,60 cases;Group C:normal full term formula feeding,60 cases;Group D:premature infant formula mixed breast feeding,60 cases.All children were fed at the first 12 to 24h after birth.The body weight,height,head circumference and catch up full term time were evaluation index. Results After correct gestational age 40 weeks,group B children'weight,height,head circumference were higher than other groups,group C was the lowest levels,the difference was statistically significant (F =3.563,P <0.05).Correct gestational age 1,3,6 months later,group A children'weight,height and head circumference index were higher than other feeding group,the level of group D was the second,the lowest level was group C,the differences were statistically significant (F =3.011,2.853,2.779,all P <0.05).In 6 months,group A,38.8% (31 /80),was the fastest one to reach the full term infant,the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =29.149,P <0.05).At other time,the pur-suing number of group A was bigger,but there was no statistically significant difference.Conclusion For premature babies,preterm infant formula milk powder or premature infant formula and milk feeding way is better than that of pure breast feeding and normal full term milk powder,which can guarantee the children's nutrition demand,shorten the time of pursuing full term infant,promote baby's health.
