CAJ | 학술논문

针对当前有关律师辩论的讨论,本研究以系统功能语言学的社会符号观为切入点,从哈贝马斯的主体间性观点出发,着重对理性辩论模式进行法律语言学建构.根据哈氏对理性交往的参与者应具有的角色关系的阐释,归纳出理性辩论的基本特点,找到这些特点在话语层面的反映与实现.接着以平等自由的言语角色关系如何在话语中实现为例,对本文的模型进行语料说明.
침대당전유관률사변론적토론,본연구이계통공능어언학적사회부호관위절입점,종합패마사적주체간성관점출발,착중대이성변론모식진행법률어언학건구.근거합씨대이성교왕적삼여자응구유적각색관계적천석,귀납출이성변론적기본특점,조도저사특점재화어층면적반영여실현.접착이평등자유적언어각색관계여하재화어중실현위례,대본문적모형진행어료설명.
In light of social semiotics of systematic functional linguistics and Habermasian inter-subjectivity, this paper mainly works on the construction of legal discourse patterns in rational debate in response to the current discussions about lawyers'debate. Based on Habermasian interpretation of rational interactions that the participants should have, fundamental characteristics of rational debates are identified and their applica-tion and realization at the discourse level have been analyzed. The model discussed in this paper has been further substantiated by an example of how equality and freedom of discourse roles can be strategically real-ized in the courtroom in China.