实用骨科杂志
實用骨科雜誌
실용골과잡지
Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
2015年
10期
891-893,958
,共4页
杨宇%刘欣伟%凯赛尔江·艾合买提%闫寒%徐子昂
楊宇%劉訢偉%凱賽爾江·艾閤買提%閆寒%徐子昂
양우%류흔위%개새이강·애합매제%염한%서자앙
Lisfranc关节损伤%Acutrak螺钉%手术治疗%足
Lisfranc關節損傷%Acutrak螺釘%手術治療%足
Lisfranc관절손상%Acutrak라정%수술치료%족
lisfranc injury%acutrak screw%surgical treatment%foot
目的:探讨空心变距无头拉力螺钉(Acutrak 螺钉)与空心螺钉切开复位内固定治疗 Lisfranc 关节损伤的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2009年5月至2014年4月收治的41例 Lisfranc 关节损伤患者,41例患者术后均获随访,随访1~29(16±3.21)个月,根据内固定不同分为 Acutrak 螺钉组(n =22),空心螺钉组(n =19),分析两组患者术后疼痛情况、患足功能及并发症并进行美国足踝外科协会评分(American orthopaedic foot and ankle society,AOFAS)及视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分。结果术后1个月、3个月 Acutrak 组 VAS 评分明显高于空心螺钉组(P <0.05),术后3月 Acutrak 组 AOFAS 评分明显高于空心螺钉组(P <0.05),Acutrak 组术后随访中并发症少于空心螺钉组差异有统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论应用 Acutrak 螺钉相比于空心螺钉切开复位内固定治疗 Lisfranc 关节损伤,术后有着足部功能的恢复较快、疼痛较轻,并发症相对较少的优势。
目的:探討空心變距無頭拉力螺釘(Acutrak 螺釘)與空心螺釘切開複位內固定治療 Lisfranc 關節損傷的臨床治療效果。方法迴顧性分析2009年5月至2014年4月收治的41例 Lisfranc 關節損傷患者,41例患者術後均穫隨訪,隨訪1~29(16±3.21)箇月,根據內固定不同分為 Acutrak 螺釘組(n =22),空心螺釘組(n =19),分析兩組患者術後疼痛情況、患足功能及併髮癥併進行美國足踝外科協會評分(American orthopaedic foot and ankle society,AOFAS)及視覺模擬評分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)評分。結果術後1箇月、3箇月 Acutrak 組 VAS 評分明顯高于空心螺釘組(P <0.05),術後3月 Acutrak 組 AOFAS 評分明顯高于空心螺釘組(P <0.05),Acutrak 組術後隨訪中併髮癥少于空心螺釘組差異有統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論應用 Acutrak 螺釘相比于空心螺釘切開複位內固定治療 Lisfranc 關節損傷,術後有著足部功能的恢複較快、疼痛較輕,併髮癥相對較少的優勢。
목적:탐토공심변거무두랍력라정(Acutrak 라정)여공심라정절개복위내고정치료 Lisfranc 관절손상적림상치료효과。방법회고성분석2009년5월지2014년4월수치적41례 Lisfranc 관절손상환자,41례환자술후균획수방,수방1~29(16±3.21)개월,근거내고정불동분위 Acutrak 라정조(n =22),공심라정조(n =19),분석량조환자술후동통정황、환족공능급병발증병진행미국족과외과협회평분(American orthopaedic foot and ankle society,AOFAS)급시각모의평분법(visual analogue scale,VAS)평분。결과술후1개월、3개월 Acutrak 조 VAS 평분명현고우공심라정조(P <0.05),술후3월 Acutrak 조 AOFAS 평분명현고우공심라정조(P <0.05),Acutrak 조술후수방중병발증소우공심라정조차이유통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론응용 Acutrak 라정상비우공심라정절개복위내고정치료 Lisfranc 관절손상,술후유착족부공능적회복교쾌、동통교경,병발증상대교소적우세。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of Acutrak screw and cannulated screw in surgical treatment of Lis-franc injury. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 41 patients with Lisfranc injury from May 2009 to April 2014,who re-ceived internal fixation with Acutrak screw(n = 22)and hollow screw(n = 19). They all were contrasted through postopera-tive complications,the ankle surgery association score(AOFAS)and visual analogue scale(VAS). Results The 41 cases were followed up,with a mean period of 16 ± 3. 21(from 1 to 29)months. The AOFAS score of Acutrak group at 1st and 6th month increased significantly than that of hollow screw group(P < 0. 05). The VAS score of Acutrak group at 1st and 6th month increased significantly than that of hollow screw group(P < 0. 05). Postoperative complications of Acutrak group was less than that of hollow screw group and the difference was significant(P > 0. 05). Conclusion In treatment of Lisfranc inju-ry,Acutrak screw is superior to conventional hollow screw in terms of better recovery of postoperative feet function,less postop-erative pain,and less incidence of complications.