西安电子科技大学学报(自然科学版)
西安電子科技大學學報(自然科學版)
서안전자과기대학학보(자연과학판)
Journal of Xidian University (Natural Science)
2015年
5期
147-153,206
,共8页
李美玲%胡耀垓%周晨%赵正予%张援农%刘静%邓忠新
李美玲%鬍耀垓%週晨%趙正予%張援農%劉靜%鄧忠新
리미령%호요해%주신%조정여%장원농%류정%산충신
支持向量机%电离层f o F2%区域预报%对比分析
支持嚮量機%電離層f o F2%區域預報%對比分析
지지향량궤%전리층f o F2%구역예보%대비분석
support vector machine%ionospheric foF2%regional prediction%comparative analysis
为了提高电离层短期区域预报效果,提出了基于支持向量机方法考虑太阳活动、地磁活动、中高层大气、地理位置等因素对电离层的影响.对中国地区电离层F2层临界频率(foF2)提前1 h的区域预报模型,将支持向量机的预报模型与输入同样参数的反向传播神经网络和国际参考电离层模型从多方面进行对比分析,结果显示,支持向量机模型的年平均预报相对误差相对神经网络和国际参考电离层模型在太阳活动高年分别降低了2.5%和9.6%,在太阳活动低年分别降低了1.9%和7.5%.在低纬度地区,支持向量机模型的预报优势更加显著,在高年和低年相对反向传播神经网络分别降低了3.2%和2.7%.对暴时,支持向量机模型也表现出一定的预报能力.这表明支持向量机模型应用在中国区域电离层foF2短期预报上,相对反向传播神经网络和国际参考电离层模型更有优势.
為瞭提高電離層短期區域預報效果,提齣瞭基于支持嚮量機方法攷慮太暘活動、地磁活動、中高層大氣、地理位置等因素對電離層的影響.對中國地區電離層F2層臨界頻率(foF2)提前1 h的區域預報模型,將支持嚮量機的預報模型與輸入同樣參數的反嚮傳播神經網絡和國際參攷電離層模型從多方麵進行對比分析,結果顯示,支持嚮量機模型的年平均預報相對誤差相對神經網絡和國際參攷電離層模型在太暘活動高年分彆降低瞭2.5%和9.6%,在太暘活動低年分彆降低瞭1.9%和7.5%.在低緯度地區,支持嚮量機模型的預報優勢更加顯著,在高年和低年相對反嚮傳播神經網絡分彆降低瞭3.2%和2.7%.對暴時,支持嚮量機模型也錶現齣一定的預報能力.這錶明支持嚮量機模型應用在中國區域電離層foF2短期預報上,相對反嚮傳播神經網絡和國際參攷電離層模型更有優勢.
위료제고전리층단기구역예보효과,제출료기우지지향량궤방법고필태양활동、지자활동、중고층대기、지리위치등인소대전리층적영향.대중국지구전리층F2층림계빈솔(foF2)제전1 h적구역예보모형,장지지향량궤적예보모형여수입동양삼수적반향전파신경망락화국제삼고전리층모형종다방면진행대비분석,결과현시,지지향량궤모형적년평균예보상대오차상대신경망락화국제삼고전리층모형재태양활동고년분별강저료2.5%화9.6%,재태양활동저년분별강저료1.9%화7.5%.재저위도지구,지지향량궤모형적예보우세경가현저,재고년화저년상대반향전파신경망락분별강저료3.2%화2.7%.대폭시,지지향량궤모형야표현출일정적예보능력.저표명지지향량궤모형응용재중국구역전리층foF2단기예보상,상대반향전파신경망락화국제삼고전리층모형경유우세.
Ionospheric short‐term forecasting is very important to radio communication , navigation and radar systems . In this paper , in order to improve the regional prediction accuracy of ionosphere , a model of regional prediction of the ionospheric F2 layer critical frequency in China area 1 hour in advance is set up based on the support vector machine (Support Vector Machine , referred to as SVM for short) method . In this model , the influence of solar activity , geomagnetic activity , the upper atmosphere , geographical location and other factors on the ionosphere is taken into consideration . Results of this model is compared to Back‐Propagation referred to as BP for short the neural network of the same input parameters and the IRI model ( International Reference Ionosphere , referred to as IRI for short) . The results show that the average relative error of annual prediction of SVM in high solar activity years decreases by 2.5% and 9.6% , respectively , compared with the neural network and the IRI models and in low solar activity decreases by 1.8% and 7.5% , respectively . In the low latitude area , the prediction of SVM has more significant advantages over the BP neural network . In the high and low solar activity years it decreases by 3.2% and 2.7% , respectively . During the storm time SVM also shows a relatively good prediction ability . This proves that the developed model based on SVM in the paper has more advantages over the BP neural network and IRI model .