CAJ | 학술논문

1991年，饶宗颐先生根据《文物》刊出何双全摘录的天水放马滩秦简《日书》撰文，认为“十六时制”的形成不始于汉而更在其前，这是符合客观实际的。由于何双全所摘录的放马滩《日书》部分释文将“五行纳音”的简文归入“律书”一类，饶宗颐先生据此认为秦时日书中纳音的办法比向来所认识与想象加倍复杂。更有甚者，何双全对放马滩《日书》部分释文的这种整理，使人误以为“中鸣”、“后鸣”与音律相配，从而产生“取时刻以入乐，借鸡鸣以配音律”的联想，故使饶宗颐先生得出“既有中鸣与后鸣，可见应该有元鸣”的推论；但从正式发表的考古报告将“五行纳音”与“律书”分开两篇来看，与“中鸣”和“后鸣”相匹配的似以见于汉简的“前鸣”更为合理。
1991년，요종이선생근거《문물》간출하쌍전적록적천수방마탄진간《일서》찬문，인위“십륙시제”적형성불시우한이경재기전，저시부합객관실제적。유우하쌍전소적록적방마탄《일서》부분석문장“오행납음”적간문귀입“률서”일류，요종이선생거차인위진시일서중납음적판법비향래소인식여상상가배복잡。경유심자，하쌍전대방마탄《일서》부분석문적저충정리，사인오이위“중명”、“후명”여음률상배，종이산생“취시각이입악，차계명이배음률”적련상，고사요종이선생득출“기유중명여후명，가견응해유원명”적추론；단종정식발표적고고보고장“오행납음”여“률서”분개량편래간，여“중명”화“후명”상필배적사이견우한간적“전명”경위합리。
In 1991, based on extracts (by He Shuang-quan,) from Qin Dynasty bamboo scripts“Ri Shu”, which was published on“Cultural Relics”, Mr. Jao Tsung-I wrote an article to point out that“the 16-hour time system”did not take shape in the Han Dynasty, but earlier than that time. Such a claim conforms to objective reality. And because some interpretations from He Shuang-quan’s extracts of Tianshui Fangmatan bamboo scripts“Ri Shu”classified“WU XING NA YIN”into the category of“LV SHU”, Jao believed that the modess of NA YIN (setting tones) in Qin Dynasty was more complex than ever expected. Jao also points out some differ?ent opinions and suggestions with He Shuang-quan’s extracts concerning the setting of YIN (sound and tones) with timing.