医学综述
醫學綜述
의학종술
Medical Recapitulate
2015年
18期
3447-3448
,共2页
股骨颈骨折%人工股骨头置换术%全髋关节置换术
股骨頸骨摺%人工股骨頭置換術%全髖關節置換術
고골경골절%인공고골두치환술%전관관절치환술
Femoral neck fracture%Femoral head replacement%Total hip replacement
目的:比较人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法将2006年11月至2013年11月北京市大兴区红星医院骨外科诊断为股骨颈骨折的老年患者86例,依据随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各43例,分别予以全髋关节置换术和人工股骨头置换术。记录并观察两组患者 Harris评分、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及术后并发症情况。结果①与对照组比较,观察组手术时间较长、术中出血量较多,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),两组术后引流量比较差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。②观察组早期并发症发生率为4.9%,低于对照组的18.6%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.07,P<0.05)。③观察组 Harris评分优良率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.326,P<0.05)。结论对老年人股骨颈骨折患者应当结合其自身条件,合理选择人工股骨头置换或全髋关节置换术治疗,以减少股骨颈骨折严重并发症的发生,提高患者生活质量。
目的:比較人工股骨頭置換術與全髖關節置換術治療老年人股骨頸骨摺的療效。方法將2006年11月至2013年11月北京市大興區紅星醫院骨外科診斷為股骨頸骨摺的老年患者86例,依據隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組,各43例,分彆予以全髖關節置換術和人工股骨頭置換術。記錄併觀察兩組患者 Harris評分、手術時間、術中齣血量、術後引流量及術後併髮癥情況。結果①與對照組比較,觀察組手術時間較長、術中齣血量較多,差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),兩組術後引流量比較差異無統計學意義( P >0.05)。②觀察組早期併髮癥髮生率為4.9%,低于對照組的18.6%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=4.07,P<0.05)。③觀察組 Harris評分優良率高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(Z=2.326,P<0.05)。結論對老年人股骨頸骨摺患者應噹結閤其自身條件,閤理選擇人工股骨頭置換或全髖關節置換術治療,以減少股骨頸骨摺嚴重併髮癥的髮生,提高患者生活質量。
목적:비교인공고골두치환술여전관관절치환술치료노년인고골경골절적료효。방법장2006년11월지2013년11월북경시대흥구홍성의원골외과진단위고골경골절적노년환자86례,의거수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조,각43례,분별여이전관관절치환술화인공고골두치환술。기록병관찰량조환자 Harris평분、수술시간、술중출혈량、술후인류량급술후병발증정황。결과①여대조조비교,관찰조수술시간교장、술중출혈량교다,차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),량조술후인류량비교차이무통계학의의( P >0.05)。②관찰조조기병발증발생솔위4.9%,저우대조조적18.6%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=4.07,P<0.05)。③관찰조 Harris평분우량솔고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(Z=2.326,P<0.05)。결론대노년인고골경골절환자응당결합기자신조건,합리선택인공고골두치환혹전관관절치환술치료,이감소고골경골절엄중병발증적발생,제고환자생활질량。
Objective To compare the effect of artificial femoral head replacement and total hip replace-ment on femoral neck fracture.Methods A total of 86 patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to the Beijing Daxing District Hongxing Hospital from Nov.2006 to Nov.2013 were randomly divided into two groups.43 patients in the observation group were treated with total hip replacement surgery,and 43 patients in the control group were treated by artificial femoral head replacement.The Harris ratings, the operation time,bleeding,postoperative drainage,and incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared.Results ①Comparedwiththecontrolgroup,theoperationtimewaslongerandbleedingwas greater in the observation group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01),postoperative drainage between the two groups showed no significant difference(P>0.05).②Early complications incidence of the observation group was 4.9%,of the control group was 18.6%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =4.07,P<0.05).③Compared to the control group,the observation group′Harris excellent rate was higher,the difference was statistically significant(Z=2.326,P<0.05).Conclusion Reasonable choice of artificial femoral head replacement or total hip replacement surgery should be made for the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture according to the patients′condition,so as to reduce the incidence of serious com-plications of femoral neck fractures and improve the quality of life of the patients .