世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊)
世界最新醫學信息文摘(連續型電子期刊)
세계최신의학신식문적(련속형전자기간)
World Latest Medicine Information
2015年
59期
14,13
,共2页
急性心肌梗死合并急性左心衰竭%院前急救%有效率%并发症
急性心肌梗死閤併急性左心衰竭%院前急救%有效率%併髮癥
급성심기경사합병급성좌심쇠갈%원전급구%유효솔%병발증
Acute myocardial infarction combined with acute left heart failure%Pre hospital care%Efficiency%Complication
目的 对比分析不同院前急救方式对急性心肌梗死合并急性左心衰竭患者救治效果和预后效果的影响.方法 本次临床试验研究分析选择2012年6月至2014年6月期间,本院急诊科收治的110例急性心肌梗死合并急性左心衰竭患者作为临床试验研究对象,根据院前急救方式的不同,将110例患者分为实验组和对照组.其中,对照组的院前急救方式为边转运边治疗,实验组的院前急救方式为先治疗后转运,记录并对比两组患者的救治效果以及预后影响.结果 实验组患者的救治后的总体有效率(83.64%)显著高于对照组(69.09%);实验组患者并发症的发生率(3.64%)显著低于对照组(14.55%);P均小于0.05,组间对比具有显著差异,具有统计学意义.结论 在急性心肌梗死合并急性左心衰竭患者的院前急救中,先治疗后转运的急救模式能够有效提高患者的临床治疗有效率,降低并发症的发生率,值得在临床上推广使用.
目的 對比分析不同院前急救方式對急性心肌梗死閤併急性左心衰竭患者救治效果和預後效果的影響.方法 本次臨床試驗研究分析選擇2012年6月至2014年6月期間,本院急診科收治的110例急性心肌梗死閤併急性左心衰竭患者作為臨床試驗研究對象,根據院前急救方式的不同,將110例患者分為實驗組和對照組.其中,對照組的院前急救方式為邊轉運邊治療,實驗組的院前急救方式為先治療後轉運,記錄併對比兩組患者的救治效果以及預後影響.結果 實驗組患者的救治後的總體有效率(83.64%)顯著高于對照組(69.09%);實驗組患者併髮癥的髮生率(3.64%)顯著低于對照組(14.55%);P均小于0.05,組間對比具有顯著差異,具有統計學意義.結論 在急性心肌梗死閤併急性左心衰竭患者的院前急救中,先治療後轉運的急救模式能夠有效提高患者的臨床治療有效率,降低併髮癥的髮生率,值得在臨床上推廣使用.
목적 대비분석불동원전급구방식대급성심기경사합병급성좌심쇠갈환자구치효과화예후효과적영향.방법 본차림상시험연구분석선택2012년6월지2014년6월기간,본원급진과수치적110례급성심기경사합병급성좌심쇠갈환자작위림상시험연구대상,근거원전급구방식적불동,장110례환자분위실험조화대조조.기중,대조조적원전급구방식위변전운변치료,실험조적원전급구방식위선치료후전운,기록병대비량조환자적구치효과이급예후영향.결과 실험조환자적구치후적총체유효솔(83.64%)현저고우대조조(69.09%);실험조환자병발증적발생솔(3.64%)현저저우대조조(14.55%);P균소우0.05,조간대비구유현저차이,구유통계학의의.결론 재급성심기경사합병급성좌심쇠갈환자적원전급구중,선치료후전운적급구모식능구유효제고환자적림상치료유효솔,강저병발증적발생솔,치득재림상상추엄사용.
Objective To compare treating effect and prognosis influence of difference pre-hospital care for acute myocardial infarction combined with acute left heart failure. Method in this clinical analysis and research, choose 110 cases acute myocardial infarction complicated with acute left heart failure received in our hospital during June 2014 and June 2012 as study objects, and divide them into experiment and control group according to different pre-hospital care. Pre-hospital care of control group is being treated while delivery, and experiment group is first treatment and then delivery. Record and compare treating effects and prognosis influence of two groups.Result total effective rate of experiment group(83.64%) is significantly higher than control group (69.09%), complication rate of experiment group (3.64%) is significantly lower than control group (14.55%), and P is less than 0.05, difference between groups shows statistical significance.Conclusion in pre hospital emergency treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with acute left heart failure, mode of first treatment then delivery can effectively improve patient's clinical effective rate, and reduce complication rate, and which is worthy of being spreaded clinically.