临床医药文献电子杂志
臨床醫藥文獻電子雜誌
림상의약문헌전자잡지
Journal of Clinical Medical Literature (ElectronicEdition)
2015年
27期
5715-5715,5718
,共2页
X线%空气灌肠造影%CT%小儿肠套叠
X線%空氣灌腸造影%CT%小兒腸套疊
X선%공기관장조영%CT%소인장투첩
X-ray%Air enema%CT%Intussusception in children
目的：分析X线平片、空气灌肠造影与CT用于小儿肠套叠诊断与鉴别的对比。方法选取2013年9月～2014年9月我院收治的肠套叠患儿180例为研究对象，均行X线平片、空气灌肠造影、CT诊断，对比观察各项指标数据。结果 X线诊断为管腔较狭窄，扩张度差，检出率为91%；空气灌肠造影灵敏度、特异性较高，检出率100%；CT诊断为肠道呈节段或者普遍积气、积液、扩张，检出率为100%。空气灌肠造影诊断、CT组患儿家属满意度高于X线平片诊断。结论 CT和空气灌肠造影诊断对小儿肠套叠的检出率高于X线平片，更加可靠。
目的：分析X線平片、空氣灌腸造影與CT用于小兒腸套疊診斷與鑒彆的對比。方法選取2013年9月～2014年9月我院收治的腸套疊患兒180例為研究對象，均行X線平片、空氣灌腸造影、CT診斷，對比觀察各項指標數據。結果 X線診斷為管腔較狹窄，擴張度差，檢齣率為91%；空氣灌腸造影靈敏度、特異性較高，檢齣率100%；CT診斷為腸道呈節段或者普遍積氣、積液、擴張，檢齣率為100%。空氣灌腸造影診斷、CT組患兒傢屬滿意度高于X線平片診斷。結論 CT和空氣灌腸造影診斷對小兒腸套疊的檢齣率高于X線平片，更加可靠。
목적：분석X선평편、공기관장조영여CT용우소인장투첩진단여감별적대비。방법선취2013년9월～2014년9월아원수치적장투첩환인180례위연구대상，균행X선평편、공기관장조영、CT진단，대비관찰각항지표수거。결과 X선진단위관강교협착，확장도차，검출솔위91%；공기관장조영령민도、특이성교고，검출솔100%；CT진단위장도정절단혹자보편적기、적액、확장，검출솔위100%。공기관장조영진단、CT조환인가속만의도고우X선평편진단。결론 CT화공기관장조영진단대소인장투첩적검출솔고우X선평편，경가가고。
ObjectiveTo analyze the X-ray, air contrast enema and CT for pediatric intussusception identified.MethodsHospital pediatric intussusception 180 patients underwent X-ray, air enema, CT diagnosis, compared to observe the indicators data.Results The show, X-ray diagnosis of narrow lumen expansion poor detection rate was 91.0%; air enema sensitivity, high specifi city, the detection rate of 100%; CT was diagnosed with intestinal segments or general product gas, fl uid, expansion, the detection rate was 100.0%. Air enema diagnosis, CT group of children with family satisfaction higher than X-ray diagnosis.ConclusionCT and air enema diagnosis of intussusception in children is higher than the detection rate of the X-ray to check more reliable.
