广州医科大学学报
廣州醫科大學學報
엄주의과대학학보
Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
2015年
4期
83-85
,共3页
罗卓鹏%柳建华%刘丽兰%何佩仪
囉卓鵬%柳建華%劉麗蘭%何珮儀
라탁붕%류건화%류려란%하패의
经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管%超声%静脉炎%导管相关性血栓
經外週靜脈置入中心靜脈導管%超聲%靜脈炎%導管相關性血栓
경외주정맥치입중심정맥도관%초성%정맥염%도관상관성혈전
peripherally inserted central catheter%ultrasound%phlebitis%catheter-related thrombosis
目的::评价便携式超声仪引导下经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管( PICC)术的临床价值。方法:将2013年12月至2014年11月在广州市第一人民医院就诊的需长期输液的245例患者作为研究对象,根据上肢血管条件分为对照组(血管条件相对较好,103例)和观察组(血管条件较差者,142例)。对照组采用常规盲穿式PICC置管;观察组采用超声仪引导下结合赛丁格技术行PICC置管。比较两组一次性穿刺成功率、一次性置管成功率、术后静脉炎发生率、导管相关性血栓发生率。结果:观察组一次性穿刺成功率、一次置管成功率均高于对照组(P<0.05),而置管后静脉炎、导管相关性血栓发生率均低于对照组( P<0.05)。结论:便携式超声仪引导结合赛丁格技术行PICC置管术的置管成功率高、术后并发症少,安全性高。
目的::評價便攜式超聲儀引導下經外週靜脈置入中心靜脈導管( PICC)術的臨床價值。方法:將2013年12月至2014年11月在廣州市第一人民醫院就診的需長期輸液的245例患者作為研究對象,根據上肢血管條件分為對照組(血管條件相對較好,103例)和觀察組(血管條件較差者,142例)。對照組採用常規盲穿式PICC置管;觀察組採用超聲儀引導下結閤賽丁格技術行PICC置管。比較兩組一次性穿刺成功率、一次性置管成功率、術後靜脈炎髮生率、導管相關性血栓髮生率。結果:觀察組一次性穿刺成功率、一次置管成功率均高于對照組(P<0.05),而置管後靜脈炎、導管相關性血栓髮生率均低于對照組( P<0.05)。結論:便攜式超聲儀引導結閤賽丁格技術行PICC置管術的置管成功率高、術後併髮癥少,安全性高。
목적::평개편휴식초성의인도하경외주정맥치입중심정맥도관( PICC)술적림상개치。방법:장2013년12월지2014년11월재엄주시제일인민의원취진적수장기수액적245례환자작위연구대상,근거상지혈관조건분위대조조(혈관조건상대교호,103례)화관찰조(혈관조건교차자,142례)。대조조채용상규맹천식PICC치관;관찰조채용초성의인도하결합새정격기술행PICC치관。비교량조일차성천자성공솔、일차성치관성공솔、술후정맥염발생솔、도관상관성혈전발생솔。결과:관찰조일차성천자성공솔、일차치관성공솔균고우대조조(P<0.05),이치관후정맥염、도관상관성혈전발생솔균저우대조조( P<0.05)。결론:편휴식초성의인도결합새정격기술행PICC치관술적치관성공솔고、술후병발증소,안전성고。
Objective:To evaluate the clinical value of the peripherally inserted central catheter ( PICC) through superficial vein of upper limb under the guidance of portable ultrasonic instrument. Methods:A total of 245 patients, who needed long-term transfusion in Guangzhou First People′s Hospital between December 2013 and November 2014, were included as the subjects in the study. All the patients were divided into the control group ( patients with relatively good condition of blood vessel, n=103 ) and the study group ( patients with relatively bad condition of blood vessel, n=142) . Routine group stick with the traditional way and insertion sites located in cubital fossa. Test group were under the bedside ultrasound with seldinger technique and chose the basilic or brachial veins in the upper arm to insert the PICC line.The one-time puncture success rate, one-time PICC success rate, postoperative phlebitis incidence, and catheter-related thrombus incidence between the groups were compared. Results:The one-time puncture success rate and one-time PICC success rate in the study group were higher than those in the control group ( P<0. 05 ) , whereas the postoperative phlebitis incidence and catheter-related thrombus incidence in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion:The PICC under the guidance of ultrasonic instrument and Seldinger technique show high success rate of catheterization, low incidence of postoperative complication and high safety.