产业经济评论
產業經濟評論
산업경제평론
Modern Industrial Economy
2015年
5期
20-28
,共9页
纵向差别化%技术定位%竞争策略效应%产业政策%反垄断政策
縱嚮差彆化%技術定位%競爭策略效應%產業政策%反壟斷政策
종향차별화%기술정위%경쟁책략효응%산업정책%반롱단정책
Vertical Differentiation%Technology Orientation%Competitive Strategy Effect%Industrial Policy%Antimonopoly Policy
在不对称寡头纵向差别竞争格局下,技术领导企业有较强的策略激励保持技术领先优势,后来企业产品技术定位受到消费者需求偏好、产品质量差距、行业技术创新成本等因素的影响。由于低质量后来企业的技术进步存在“创新收益陷阱”,因此,纵向产品差别化竞争均衡体现出适当比例技术差距原则,并且低技术产品企业的市场份额和企业利润也未必较低。在智能手机等行业,中国本土企业低端产品技术定位是企业内生性战略选择,技术创新与商业模式创新结合的协同创新模式更容易克服“创新收益陷阱”并实现赶超。单纯基于技术决定论的产业政策很难取得成功,技术领导企业的高价格和高利润也成为反垄断目标,只有其排斥竞争者的滥用行为才应该受到反垄断法的禁止。
在不對稱寡頭縱嚮差彆競爭格跼下,技術領導企業有較彊的策略激勵保持技術領先優勢,後來企業產品技術定位受到消費者需求偏好、產品質量差距、行業技術創新成本等因素的影響。由于低質量後來企業的技術進步存在“創新收益陷阱”,因此,縱嚮產品差彆化競爭均衡體現齣適噹比例技術差距原則,併且低技術產品企業的市場份額和企業利潤也未必較低。在智能手機等行業,中國本土企業低耑產品技術定位是企業內生性戰略選擇,技術創新與商業模式創新結閤的協同創新模式更容易剋服“創新收益陷阱”併實現趕超。單純基于技術決定論的產業政策很難取得成功,技術領導企業的高價格和高利潤也成為反壟斷目標,隻有其排斥競爭者的濫用行為纔應該受到反壟斷法的禁止。
재불대칭과두종향차별경쟁격국하,기술령도기업유교강적책략격려보지기술령선우세,후래기업산품기술정위수도소비자수구편호、산품질량차거、행업기술창신성본등인소적영향。유우저질량후래기업적기술진보존재“창신수익함정”,인차,종향산품차별화경쟁균형체현출괄당비례기술차거원칙,병차저기술산품기업적시장빈액화기업리윤야미필교저。재지능수궤등행업,중국본토기업저단산품기술정위시기업내생성전략선택,기술창신여상업모식창신결합적협동창신모식경용역극복“창신수익함정”병실현간초。단순기우기술결정론적산업정책흔난취득성공,기술령도기업적고개격화고리윤야성위반롱단목표,지유기배척경쟁자적람용행위재응해수도반롱단법적금지。
Under the competition pattern of vertical differentiation among the asymmetric oligarches, the technology-oriented enterprises maintain a leading superiority in technology. However, the later-comer enterprises’ positioning of production technology is affected by such factors as the consumer’s demand preference, product quality difference and costs of technical innovation in the industry etc. Because of the inferior quality, later-comer enterprises have the“innovative earnings trap”for the technical advancement of enterprise. Therefore, the competitive equilibrium of vertical product differentiation relfects the principle of technical gap at appropriate proportion. Chinese local enterprises in low-end products positioning technology enterprise strategic choice is endogenous, collaborative innovation model of technology innovation and business model innovation combining more easily overcome"innovation income trap"and achieve catch-up, industrial policy is difficult to success. High prices and high proifts of technology leading enterprises should not be antitrust goal.