中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
28期
89-91
,共3页
妇产科%腹部切口脂肪液化%微波%α-糜蛋白酶%临床效果
婦產科%腹部切口脂肪液化%微波%α-糜蛋白酶%臨床效果
부산과%복부절구지방액화%미파%α-미단백매%림상효과
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology%Fat liquefaction in abdominal incision%Microwave%α- chymotrypsin%Clinical effect
目的 探讨和分析妇产科腹部切口脂肪液化患者的临床治疗方法以及疗效情况. 方法 随机抽取2010年1月—2015年1月期间,该院妇产科收治的腹部切口脂肪液化患者70例. 根据抽签法将患者划分成平局的两组,即:对照组35例,采用常规方法治疗;观察组35例,采用微波联合α-糜蛋白酶治疗,并就两组患者的临床治疗情况以及效果进行统计学比较和分析. 结果 临床对比统计显示,观察组患者的治疗时间、换药次数以及伤口愈合时间均明显少于对照组患者,且临床治疗总有效率(100.0%)和患者总满意度(97.14%)均明显高于对照组患者(80.0%,71.43%),组间对比存差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 对妇产科腹部切口脂肪液化患者采用微波联合α-糜蛋白酶进行临床治疗,能够有效加快伤口愈合,促进患者恢复,提高临床疗效,因此,它是一种科学、有效、理想的临床治疗方法.
目的 探討和分析婦產科腹部切口脂肪液化患者的臨床治療方法以及療效情況. 方法 隨機抽取2010年1月—2015年1月期間,該院婦產科收治的腹部切口脂肪液化患者70例. 根據抽籤法將患者劃分成平跼的兩組,即:對照組35例,採用常規方法治療;觀察組35例,採用微波聯閤α-糜蛋白酶治療,併就兩組患者的臨床治療情況以及效果進行統計學比較和分析. 結果 臨床對比統計顯示,觀察組患者的治療時間、換藥次數以及傷口愈閤時間均明顯少于對照組患者,且臨床治療總有效率(100.0%)和患者總滿意度(97.14%)均明顯高于對照組患者(80.0%,71.43%),組間對比存差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05). 結論 對婦產科腹部切口脂肪液化患者採用微波聯閤α-糜蛋白酶進行臨床治療,能夠有效加快傷口愈閤,促進患者恢複,提高臨床療效,因此,它是一種科學、有效、理想的臨床治療方法.
목적 탐토화분석부산과복부절구지방액화환자적림상치료방법이급료효정황. 방법 수궤추취2010년1월—2015년1월기간,해원부산과수치적복부절구지방액화환자70례. 근거추첨법장환자화분성평국적량조,즉:대조조35례,채용상규방법치료;관찰조35례,채용미파연합α-미단백매치료,병취량조환자적림상치료정황이급효과진행통계학비교화분석. 결과 림상대비통계현시,관찰조환자적치료시간、환약차수이급상구유합시간균명현소우대조조환자,차림상치료총유효솔(100.0%)화환자총만의도(97.14%)균명현고우대조조환자(80.0%,71.43%),조간대비존차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05). 결론 대부산과복부절구지방액화환자채용미파연합α-미단백매진행림상치료,능구유효가쾌상구유합,촉진환자회복,제고림상료효,인차,타시일충과학、유효、이상적림상치료방법.
Objective To investigate and analyze the treatment and efficacy of fat colliquation in abdominal incisions in patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Methods 70 patients with fat colliquation in abdominal incisions admitted to the De-partment of Gynecology and Obstetrics in this hospital between January 2010 and January 2015 were selected and divided random-ly into control group (n=35) and observation group (n=35). The control group adopted conventional therapy, while the observation group was treated with microwave combined withα-Chymotrypsin. The treatment and efficacy were analyzed and compared be-tween the two groups. Results The duration of treatment, frequency of dressing change, wound healing time were all shorter in the observation group than in the control group, while the total effective rate (100.0% vs 80.0%) and overall satisfaction (97.14% vs 71.43%) were all higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences above were statistically significant between the two groups, n<0.05. Conclusion Microwave combined withα-Chymotrypsin, in the treatment of patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with fat liquefaction in abdominal incision, can accelerate wound healing, promote their recovery and improve the efficacy, therefore it is a scientific, effective and ideal regime.
