中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
28期
22-24
,共3页
赵伟%曲芳%梁战华%孙英健
趙偉%麯芳%樑戰華%孫英健
조위%곡방%량전화%손영건
频率%电刺激%治疗%面肌痉挛
頻率%電刺激%治療%麵肌痙攣
빈솔%전자격%치료%면기경련
Frequency%Electrical stimulation%Treatment%Hemifacial spasm
目的 比较不同频率的电刺激治疗面肌痉挛疗效. 方法 该研究病例来源于2012年4月—2015年4月大连市第二人民医院神经内科门诊就诊的HFS患者62例. 该研究中应用1Hz和2Hz两种频率的电刺激疗法治疗面肌痉挛,根据治疗频率的不同分为两组,1Hz治疗组为A组,2Hz治疗组为B组. 观察指标为患者面肌痉挛的COHEN分级,记录两组的有效率及治愈率,通过对比研究的方式来比较两组的疗效,进而寻找最佳的治疗频率. 结果 共治疗偏侧面肌痉挛患者62例,A组治疗30例,B组治疗32例. A组的治愈率10%,缓解率70%;B组治愈率6.25%,缓解率40.6%. 两组治愈率χ2=0.006, P=0.940,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组缓解率χ2=7.005,P=0.008,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).A组患者治疗过程中的疼痛感较轻,依从性更好. 结论 1Hz频率电刺激治疗面肌痉挛的效果较2Hz更好.
目的 比較不同頻率的電刺激治療麵肌痙攣療效. 方法 該研究病例來源于2012年4月—2015年4月大連市第二人民醫院神經內科門診就診的HFS患者62例. 該研究中應用1Hz和2Hz兩種頻率的電刺激療法治療麵肌痙攣,根據治療頻率的不同分為兩組,1Hz治療組為A組,2Hz治療組為B組. 觀察指標為患者麵肌痙攣的COHEN分級,記錄兩組的有效率及治愈率,通過對比研究的方式來比較兩組的療效,進而尋找最佳的治療頻率. 結果 共治療偏側麵肌痙攣患者62例,A組治療30例,B組治療32例. A組的治愈率10%,緩解率70%;B組治愈率6.25%,緩解率40.6%. 兩組治愈率χ2=0.006, P=0.940,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組緩解率χ2=7.005,P=0.008,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).A組患者治療過程中的疼痛感較輕,依從性更好. 結論 1Hz頻率電刺激治療麵肌痙攣的效果較2Hz更好.
목적 비교불동빈솔적전자격치료면기경련료효. 방법 해연구병례래원우2012년4월—2015년4월대련시제이인민의원신경내과문진취진적HFS환자62례. 해연구중응용1Hz화2Hz량충빈솔적전자격요법치료면기경련,근거치료빈솔적불동분위량조,1Hz치료조위A조,2Hz치료조위B조. 관찰지표위환자면기경련적COHEN분급,기록량조적유효솔급치유솔,통과대비연구적방식래비교량조적료효,진이심조최가적치료빈솔. 결과 공치료편측면기경련환자62례,A조치료30례,B조치료32례. A조적치유솔10%,완해솔70%;B조치유솔6.25%,완해솔40.6%. 량조치유솔χ2=0.006, P=0.940,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조완해솔χ2=7.005,P=0.008,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).A조환자치료과정중적동통감교경,의종성경호. 결론 1Hz빈솔전자격치료면기경련적효과교2Hz경호.
Objective To compare the effect of different frequencies of electric stimulation in the treatment of hemifacial spasm (HFS). Methods Sixty-two patients with HFS treated in the Neurology Clinic of The Second Hospital of Dalian from April 2012 to April 2015 were selected as the subjects. We used electric stimulation of 1Hz and 2Hz frequency to treat the HFS patients in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, group A and group B in accordance with the frequency of electric stimulation. Patients in group A were treated by 1Hz electric stimulation, and those in group B were treated by 2Hz electric stimulation. Cohen classification was used as the observation index of hemifacial spasm. The response rate and cure rate of the two groups was recorded. The efficacy of the two groups was compared for finding the best treatment frequency of electric stimulation. Results A total of 62 patients with HFS were treated, including 30 cases in group A and 32 cases in group B. The cure rate was 10% in group A, and 6.25%in group B, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, χ2=0.006, P=0.940. The re-mission rate was 70%in group A, and 40.6%in group B, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant,χ2=7.005, P=0.008. Group A had less pain and better compliance. Conclusion 1Hz electric stimulation has better effect than 2Hz electric stimulation on hemifacial spasm patients.
