中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
28期
56-57
,共2页
克氏针%钢板%桡骨远端骨折
剋氏針%鋼闆%橈骨遠耑骨摺
극씨침%강판%뇨골원단골절
Kirschner wire%Steel plate%Distal radius fracture
目的 比较克氏针与钢板在桡骨远端骨折治疗中的效果. 方法 整群选取2012年1月—2015年1月该院收治的桡骨远端骨折患者86例进行观察,分成两组,观察组43例采用切开复位钢板内固定,对照组43例采用闭合复位克氏钉固定. 结果 观察组优良率为83.7%,对照组优良率为72.1%,两组比较有差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为2.3%, 对显著优于对照组并发症发生率16.3%(P<0.05). 结论 桡骨远端骨折切开复位钢板固定疗效显著优于克氏针,值得应用.
目的 比較剋氏針與鋼闆在橈骨遠耑骨摺治療中的效果. 方法 整群選取2012年1月—2015年1月該院收治的橈骨遠耑骨摺患者86例進行觀察,分成兩組,觀察組43例採用切開複位鋼闆內固定,對照組43例採用閉閤複位剋氏釘固定. 結果 觀察組優良率為83.7%,對照組優良率為72.1%,兩組比較有差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組併髮癥髮生率為2.3%, 對顯著優于對照組併髮癥髮生率16.3%(P<0.05). 結論 橈骨遠耑骨摺切開複位鋼闆固定療效顯著優于剋氏針,值得應用.
목적 비교극씨침여강판재뇨골원단골절치료중적효과. 방법 정군선취2012년1월—2015년1월해원수치적뇨골원단골절환자86례진행관찰,분성량조,관찰조43례채용절개복위강판내고정,대조조43례채용폐합복위극씨정고정. 결과 관찰조우량솔위83.7%,대조조우량솔위72.1%,량조비교유차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조병발증발생솔위2.3%, 대현저우우대조조병발증발생솔16.3%(P<0.05). 결론 뇨골원단골절절개복위강판고정료효현저우우극씨침,치득응용.
Objective To compare the effect of the treatment of the distal radius fracture with the Kirschner wire and the steel plate. Methods An observation was conducted on the 86 patients with distal radius fractures treated in our department from Jan-uary 2012 to January 2015. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the observation group and the control group with 43 cases in each. Patients in the observation group were treated by open reduction and internal fixation with steel plate, and those in the con-trol group were treated by closed reduction and fixation with Kirschner wire. Results The good and excellent rate was 83.7%in the observation group, and that was 72.1% in the control group, the difference between the two groups was significant (P<0.05). The observation group had much lower incidence of complications than the control group(2.3% vs 16.3%)(P<0.05). Conclusion For the treatment of distal radius fracture, the curative effect of open reduction and internal fixation with steel plate is better than that of fixation with Kirschner wire, so the former is worthy of application.