CAJ | 학술논문

我国《著作权法(修订草案送审稿)》至今未见交付全国人大审议,足见利益博弈之激烈、各方分歧之严重、利益平衡之重要.文章对送审稿与现行法可适用于图书馆之著作权限制条款进行了对比;分析了《著作权法》第三次修订的问题有修订工作专家委员会的代表性严重不足,法律修订过于滞后且缺乏系统性,送审稿未能解决本次修订必须解决的关键问题等.探析了设立可适用于图书馆之著作权限制的法理依据,对当前适度扩大可适用于图书馆之著作权限制是知识信息的传播和使用方式发生巨大变化,以及提高国民科学文化素质,便于教学和科学研究,促进国家发展、民族振兴的现实需要,进而提出了几点对送审稿可适用于图书馆之著作权限制条款的修改建议.
아국《저작권법(수정초안송심고)》지금미견교부전국인대심의,족견이익박혁지격렬、각방분기지엄중、이익평형지중요.문장대송심고여현행법가괄용우도서관지저작권한제조관진행료대비;분석료《저작권법》제삼차수정적문제유수정공작전가위원회적대표성엄중불족,법률수정과우체후차결핍계통성,송심고미능해결본차수정필수해결적관건문제등.탐석료설립가괄용우도서관지저작권한제적법리의거,대당전괄도확대가괄용우도서관지저작권한제시지식신식적전파화사용방식발생거대변화,이급제고국민과학문화소질,편우교학화과학연구,촉진국가발전、민족진흥적현실수요,진이제출료궤점대송심고가괄용우도서관지저작권한제조관적수개건의.
The Copyright Law( Revised Draft ) remains stuck in submission to investigation, which indicates the intensified game of interests, the serious disagreement and the important balancing of interests. By comparison between the revised draft and the current law that is applicable to copyright limitations in library world, this article analyzed the deficiencies in that the membership of the committee undertaking the amendment is lacking in representativeness, the amendment suffers from time-delay and lacks overall systematicness, and the critical problems remain unsolved in the current draft revision. It is found that dissemination of knowledge and information would change dramatically, so as to enhance the scientiifc and cultural quality of our nationals, provide beneifts for teaching and science researches and ifnally promote national development and revitalize the nation in the long run, if the applicability of copyright limitations could be appropriately extended. Based on the above realistic needs, this article, therefore, has concretely analyzed the legal foundation of copyright limitations applicable to library and mainly proposed some suggestions on the revision of China's Copyright Law. copyright limitations.