广州医科大学学报
廣州醫科大學學報
엄주의과대학학보
Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
2015年
4期
58-61
,共4页
钟晶%贾金平%肖永红%胡健蓉%杨若雅
鐘晶%賈金平%肖永紅%鬍健蓉%楊若雅
종정%가금평%초영홍%호건용%양약아
COOK宫颈扩张球囊%足月妊娠%促宫颈成熟%引产
COOK宮頸擴張毬囊%足月妊娠%促宮頸成熟%引產
COOK궁경확장구낭%족월임신%촉궁경성숙%인산
COOK cervical dilatation balloon%full-term pregnancy%cervical ripening%induction labor
目的::探讨COOK宫颈扩张球囊在足月妊娠促宫颈成熟引产中的临床效果及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2011年9月至2014年10月广州市花都区妇幼保健院收治的300例足月妊娠有引产指征孕妇的临床资料,根据促宫颈成熟方式的不同分为研究组( COOK宫颈扩张球囊,173例)和对照组(地诺前列酮栓,127例),比较两组促宫颈成熟情况、引产结局、新生儿结局及引产过程差异。结果:置入或用药后两组Bishop评分均较治疗前提高(P<0.05),但两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组缩宫素使用率、引产成功率、阴道分娩率高于对照组,产后出血量、剖宫产率低于对照组( P<0.05);两组第一产程时间、宫颈裂伤发生率、阴道血肿率、新生儿体质量、新生儿窒息率、新生儿窘迫率、新生儿第1分钟Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论:COOK宫颈扩张球囊在足月妊娠促宫颈成熟引产中具有较好临床效果,不增加产妇和胎儿并发症,具有安全、有效的特点。
目的::探討COOK宮頸擴張毬囊在足月妊娠促宮頸成熟引產中的臨床效果及安全性。方法:迴顧性分析2011年9月至2014年10月廣州市花都區婦幼保健院收治的300例足月妊娠有引產指徵孕婦的臨床資料,根據促宮頸成熟方式的不同分為研究組( COOK宮頸擴張毬囊,173例)和對照組(地諾前列酮栓,127例),比較兩組促宮頸成熟情況、引產結跼、新生兒結跼及引產過程差異。結果:置入或用藥後兩組Bishop評分均較治療前提高(P<0.05),但兩組之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。研究組縮宮素使用率、引產成功率、陰道分娩率高于對照組,產後齣血量、剖宮產率低于對照組( P<0.05);兩組第一產程時間、宮頸裂傷髮生率、陰道血腫率、新生兒體質量、新生兒窒息率、新生兒窘迫率、新生兒第1分鐘Apgar評分比較,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論:COOK宮頸擴張毬囊在足月妊娠促宮頸成熟引產中具有較好臨床效果,不增加產婦和胎兒併髮癥,具有安全、有效的特點。
목적::탐토COOK궁경확장구낭재족월임신촉궁경성숙인산중적림상효과급안전성。방법:회고성분석2011년9월지2014년10월엄주시화도구부유보건원수치적300례족월임신유인산지정잉부적림상자료,근거촉궁경성숙방식적불동분위연구조( COOK궁경확장구낭,173례)화대조조(지낙전렬동전,127례),비교량조촉궁경성숙정황、인산결국、신생인결국급인산과정차이。결과:치입혹용약후량조Bishop평분균교치료전제고(P<0.05),단량조지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。연구조축궁소사용솔、인산성공솔、음도분면솔고우대조조,산후출혈량、부궁산솔저우대조조( P<0.05);량조제일산정시간、궁경렬상발생솔、음도혈종솔、신생인체질량、신생인질식솔、신생인군박솔、신생인제1분종Apgar평분비교,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론:COOK궁경확장구낭재족월임신촉궁경성숙인산중구유교호림상효과,불증가산부화태인병발증,구유안전、유효적특점。
Objective:To investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of COOK cervical dilation balloon in promoting cervical ripening for induction labor in full-term pregnancies. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 300 cases of full-term pregnancy indicated for induction labor at Huadu District Maternal and Children′s Hospital between September 2011 and October 2014. According to the methods of cervical ripening, the subjects were divided into study group ( COOK cervical dilatation balloon, n=173) and control group ( dinoprostone suppository, n=127) . The cervical ripening, outcomes of induction labor, neonatal outcome and induction process were compared between the both groups. Results: Compared with baseline, the two groups had increased Bishop scores after balloon placement or medication (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0. 05 ) . The study group showed greater use of oxytocin, higher rates of induction success and vaginal delivery, but lower rates of postpartum hemorrhage and cesarean section than the control group ( P<0. 05 ) . There were no statistically significant differences in the duration of first-stage labor, cervical laceration, vaginal hematoma, newborn body mass, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal distress, and first-minute neonatal Apgar score between the two groups ( P>0.05) . Conclusion:COOK cervical dilation balloon is clinically favorable in promoting cervical ripening for induction labor in full-term pregnancy, and is safe and effective without increased maternal and fetal complications.