中国卫生产业
中國衛生產業
중국위생산업
China Health Industry
2015年
18期
88-90
,共3页
普外科%风险管理%护理管理
普外科%風險管理%護理管理
보외과%풍험관리%호리관리
Department of General Surgery%Risk Management%Nursing Management
目的：探究普外科护理管理中实施风险管理的应用效果。方法选取该院2012年3月—2014年3月收治的普外科患者300例作为此次的研究对象，按照随机分组法分为两组，分别为干预组和常规组，每组患者各150例。常规组采取一般性的护理管理模式，干预组在此基础上采用风险管理模式，比较两组患者的临床护理效果与患者对护理工作的满意度。结果常规组护理风险与护患纠纷的发生率分别为17.3%、19.3%，干预组患者分别为3.3%、4.0%，干预组患者护理风险与护患纠纷的发生率明显低于常规组，比较差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；干预组患者的满意度为96.0%，常规组的为78.7%，干预组的护理满意度明显高于常规组，比较差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论在风险管理模式下对普外科患者进行科学、合理的护理干预能够显著提高护理满意度，降低护理风险发生率与护患纠纷发生率，提高护理质量，值得进一步推广并应用。
目的：探究普外科護理管理中實施風險管理的應用效果。方法選取該院2012年3月—2014年3月收治的普外科患者300例作為此次的研究對象，按照隨機分組法分為兩組，分彆為榦預組和常規組，每組患者各150例。常規組採取一般性的護理管理模式，榦預組在此基礎上採用風險管理模式，比較兩組患者的臨床護理效果與患者對護理工作的滿意度。結果常規組護理風險與護患糾紛的髮生率分彆為17.3%、19.3%，榦預組患者分彆為3.3%、4.0%，榦預組患者護理風險與護患糾紛的髮生率明顯低于常規組，比較差異具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；榦預組患者的滿意度為96.0%，常規組的為78.7%，榦預組的護理滿意度明顯高于常規組，比較差異具有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論在風險管理模式下對普外科患者進行科學、閤理的護理榦預能夠顯著提高護理滿意度，降低護理風險髮生率與護患糾紛髮生率，提高護理質量，值得進一步推廣併應用。
목적：탐구보외과호리관리중실시풍험관리적응용효과。방법선취해원2012년3월—2014년3월수치적보외과환자300례작위차차적연구대상，안조수궤분조법분위량조，분별위간예조화상규조，매조환자각150례。상규조채취일반성적호리관리모식，간예조재차기출상채용풍험관리모식，비교량조환자적림상호리효과여환자대호리공작적만의도。결과상규조호리풍험여호환규분적발생솔분별위17.3%、19.3%，간예조환자분별위3.3%、4.0%，간예조환자호리풍험여호환규분적발생솔명현저우상규조，비교차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；간예조환자적만의도위96.0%，상규조적위78.7%，간예조적호리만의도명현고우상규조，비교차이구유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론재풍험관리모식하대보외과환자진행과학、합리적호리간예능구현저제고호리만의도，강저호리풍험발생솔여호환규분발생솔，제고호리질량，치득진일보추엄병응용。
Objective To explore the application effect of risk management in nursing management in Department of general surgery. Methods From March 2012 to March 2014, 300 patients were randomly divided into two groups, the intervention group and the conventional group, with 150 cases in each group. In the conventional group, the general nursing management mode, the intervention group, the risk management mode, the clinical nursing effect of the two groups of patients and the satisfaction of patients to nursing work. Results The incidence rate of nursing risk and nurse patient disputes were 17.3%, 19.3%, respectively, 3.3% and 4% respectively. The difference was significant (P<0.05). The satisfaction degree of the in-tervention group was 78.7%, and that of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). Conclusion Scientific and reasonable nursing intervention can significantly improve nursing satisfaction, reduce the incidence of nursing risk, and improve the nursing quality. It is worthy of further promotion and application.
