中国急救医学
中國急救醫學
중국급구의학
Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
2015年
10期
878-882
,共5页
魏凯%杨万杰%冯庆国%王伟%李昶%张茹梅%赵雪峰
魏凱%楊萬傑%馮慶國%王偉%李昶%張茹梅%趙雪峰
위개%양만걸%풍경국%왕위%리창%장여매%조설봉
分肺机械通气(DLV)%非对称性肺损伤%急性呼吸衰竭%双腔气管插管
分肺機械通氣(DLV)%非對稱性肺損傷%急性呼吸衰竭%雙腔氣管插管
분폐궤계통기(DLV)%비대칭성폐손상%급성호흡쇠갈%쌍강기관삽관
Differential lung ventilation%Asymmetric lung injury%Acute respiratory failure%Double lumen endotracheal intubation
目的探讨分肺机械通气( DLV)治疗严重非对称性肺损伤的疗效。方法选择因严重非对称性肺损伤导致急性呼吸衰竭患者15例,常规单机机械通气治疗失效后通过双腔气管插管应用两台呼吸机分别与患侧肺(损伤重)和健侧肺(损伤轻或无损伤)连接实施DLV,观察DLV前及DLV后12 h、24 h、36 h呼吸力学、血流动力学、氧合指标变化。结果 DLV后各指标较前改善,表现为动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)提高,24 h、36 h明显高于DLV前(P<0.05);氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)改善,各时间段均明显高于DLV前(P<0.05或P<0.01),其中24 h、36 h明显高于12 h(P<0.05);肺内分流量(QS/QT)值下降,各时间段均低于DLV前(P<0.05);平均动脉压(MAP)提高,24 h、36 h高于DLV前(P<0.05);DLV前患侧肺呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)明显低于健侧肺(P<0.05),DLV后提高,其中24 h、36 h升高明显(P<0.05);DLV前患侧肺静态顺应性(Cst)明显低于健侧肺(P<0.05),DLV后三个时间段均明显高于DLV前(P<0.05),其中36 h高于12 h( P<0.05);DLV 前健侧肺死腔量/潮气量( VD/VT )比值明显高于患侧肺( P<0.05),DLV后三个时间段均明显下降(P<0.05);DLV前患侧肺气道阻力(Raw)明显高于健侧肺(P<0.05),DLV后三个时间段均明显下降(P<0.05或P<0.01),其中24 h、36 h低于12 h(P<0.05)。结论对于传统单机通气治疗失效的严重非对称性肺损伤患者,应用DLV后可能改善病情。
目的探討分肺機械通氣( DLV)治療嚴重非對稱性肺損傷的療效。方法選擇因嚴重非對稱性肺損傷導緻急性呼吸衰竭患者15例,常規單機機械通氣治療失效後通過雙腔氣管插管應用兩檯呼吸機分彆與患側肺(損傷重)和健側肺(損傷輕或無損傷)連接實施DLV,觀察DLV前及DLV後12 h、24 h、36 h呼吸力學、血流動力學、氧閤指標變化。結果 DLV後各指標較前改善,錶現為動脈血氧飽和度(SaO2)提高,24 h、36 h明顯高于DLV前(P<0.05);氧閤指數(PaO2/FiO2)改善,各時間段均明顯高于DLV前(P<0.05或P<0.01),其中24 h、36 h明顯高于12 h(P<0.05);肺內分流量(QS/QT)值下降,各時間段均低于DLV前(P<0.05);平均動脈壓(MAP)提高,24 h、36 h高于DLV前(P<0.05);DLV前患側肺呼氣末二氧化碳分壓(PETCO2)明顯低于健側肺(P<0.05),DLV後提高,其中24 h、36 h升高明顯(P<0.05);DLV前患側肺靜態順應性(Cst)明顯低于健側肺(P<0.05),DLV後三箇時間段均明顯高于DLV前(P<0.05),其中36 h高于12 h( P<0.05);DLV 前健側肺死腔量/潮氣量( VD/VT )比值明顯高于患側肺( P<0.05),DLV後三箇時間段均明顯下降(P<0.05);DLV前患側肺氣道阻力(Raw)明顯高于健側肺(P<0.05),DLV後三箇時間段均明顯下降(P<0.05或P<0.01),其中24 h、36 h低于12 h(P<0.05)。結論對于傳統單機通氣治療失效的嚴重非對稱性肺損傷患者,應用DLV後可能改善病情。
목적탐토분폐궤계통기( DLV)치료엄중비대칭성폐손상적료효。방법선택인엄중비대칭성폐손상도치급성호흡쇠갈환자15례,상규단궤궤계통기치료실효후통과쌍강기관삽관응용량태호흡궤분별여환측폐(손상중)화건측폐(손상경혹무손상)련접실시DLV,관찰DLV전급DLV후12 h、24 h、36 h호흡역학、혈류동역학、양합지표변화。결과 DLV후각지표교전개선,표현위동맥혈양포화도(SaO2)제고,24 h、36 h명현고우DLV전(P<0.05);양합지수(PaO2/FiO2)개선,각시간단균명현고우DLV전(P<0.05혹P<0.01),기중24 h、36 h명현고우12 h(P<0.05);폐내분류량(QS/QT)치하강,각시간단균저우DLV전(P<0.05);평균동맥압(MAP)제고,24 h、36 h고우DLV전(P<0.05);DLV전환측폐호기말이양화탄분압(PETCO2)명현저우건측폐(P<0.05),DLV후제고,기중24 h、36 h승고명현(P<0.05);DLV전환측폐정태순응성(Cst)명현저우건측폐(P<0.05),DLV후삼개시간단균명현고우DLV전(P<0.05),기중36 h고우12 h( P<0.05);DLV 전건측폐사강량/조기량( VD/VT )비치명현고우환측폐( P<0.05),DLV후삼개시간단균명현하강(P<0.05);DLV전환측폐기도조력(Raw)명현고우건측폐(P<0.05),DLV후삼개시간단균명현하강(P<0.05혹P<0.01),기중24 h、36 h저우12 h(P<0.05)。결론대우전통단궤통기치료실효적엄중비대칭성폐손상환자,응용DLV후가능개선병정。
Objective To discuss the effect of differential lung ventilation ( DLV) for treatment of severe asymmetric lung injury .Methods Fifteen cases of asymmetric lung injury leading to acute respiratory failure failed to conventional single -ventilation were selected , DLV started through two ventilators connected to bad ( serious damaged ) and good ( light or no damaged ) lung respectively after double lumen endotracheal intubation .Respiratory mechanics , hemodynamics and oxygenation index change were observed before ventilation and 12 h, 24 h and 36 h after ventilation .Results The related indicators were improved after DLV .Arterial oxygen saturation ( SaO2 ) increased after DLV , 24 h and 36 h value was significantly higher than previously (95 ±2, 97 ±2 vs 86 ±4, P<0.05).Oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2 ) was improved, all time points were significantly higher than before (168 ±32, 253 ±41, 271 ±38 vs 126 ±29, P<0.05 or P<0.01), 24 h and 36 h value was significantly higher than 12 h (253 ±41, 271 ±38 vs 168 ±32, P <0.05).Pulmonary shunt (QS/QT) value was decreased, all time points were lower than before (16 ±4, 12 ±4, 10 ±3 vs 39 ±5, P<0.05).Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was improved, 24 h and 36 h value was higher than before (80 ±17, 85 ±18 vs 68 ±15, P<0.05).The bad lung pressure of end -tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) was significantly lower than that of good lung before DLV (10 ±3 vs 25 ±2, P<0.05), it increased significantly in 24 h and 36 h (18 ±4, 22 ±2 vs 10 ±3, P <0.05).The bad lung static lung compliance (Cst) was significantly lower than that of good lung before DLV (19.3 ±5.8 vs 42.6 ±6.7, P<0.05), three time points were significantly higher than before (32.1 ±6.3, 37.9 ±5.9, 41.5 ±6.7 vs 19.3 ±5.8, P<0.05), 36 h value was higher than 12 h (41.5 ±6.7 vs 32.1 ±6.3, P<0.05).The good lung dead space/tidal volume (VD/VT) ratio was significantly higher than that of bad lung before DLV (0.65 ± 0.12 vs 0.31 ±0.10, P<0.05), three time points were significantly lower than before (0.42 ±0.13, 0.36 ±0.11, 0.38 ±0.13 vs 0.65 ±0.12, P<0.05).The bad lung airway resistance (Raw) was significantly higher than that of good lung before DLV (25.7 ±2.2 vs 8.2 ±1.6, P<0.05), three time points were significantly lower than before (19.1 ±1.7, 10.6 ±2.0, 9.0 ±2.3 vs 25.7 ±2.2, P<0.05 or P<0.01), 24 h and 36 h value was lower than 12 h (10.6 ±2.0, 9.0 ±2.3 vs 19.1 ±1.7, P<0.05).Conclusion DLV may improve condition in patients diagnosed severe asymmetric lung injury failed to conventional single -ventilation.