实用心脑肺血管病杂志
實用心腦肺血管病雜誌
실용심뇌폐혈관병잡지
Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
2015年
9期
60-61,62
,共3页
心绞痛%尼可地尔%心电描记术
心絞痛%尼可地爾%心電描記術
심교통%니가지이%심전묘기술
Angina pectoris%Nicorandil%Electrocardiography
目的:探讨尼可地尔对顽固性心绞痛患者心绞痛发作及心电图 ST - T 段的影响。方法选取孝感市中心医院2012年4月—2015年4月收治的顽固性心绞痛患者80例,根据治疗方法不同分为研究组和对照组,各40例。两组患者均给予基础治疗,研究组患者给予尼可地尔治疗,对照组患者给予安慰剂治疗,两组患者均以4周为1个疗程。比较两组患者临床疗效和心电图 ST - T 段改善情况,治疗前后心绞痛发作频率和持续时间,治疗期间观察两组患者不良反应发生情况。结果两组患者临床疗效和心电图 ST - T 段改善情况比较,差异无统计学意义( u 值分别为1.883和0.727,P 值分别为0.060和0.467)。治疗前两组患者心绞痛发作频率和持续时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);治疗后研究组患者心绞痛发作频率低于对照组,持续时间短于对照组(P <0.05)。治疗期间研究组不良反应发生率为30.0%,对照组为25.0%,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论尼可地尔能有效减少顽固性心绞痛患者心绞痛发作频率,缩短心绞痛持续时间,且安全性较高,但其改善心电图 ST - T 段效果不明显。
目的:探討尼可地爾對頑固性心絞痛患者心絞痛髮作及心電圖 ST - T 段的影響。方法選取孝感市中心醫院2012年4月—2015年4月收治的頑固性心絞痛患者80例,根據治療方法不同分為研究組和對照組,各40例。兩組患者均給予基礎治療,研究組患者給予尼可地爾治療,對照組患者給予安慰劑治療,兩組患者均以4週為1箇療程。比較兩組患者臨床療效和心電圖 ST - T 段改善情況,治療前後心絞痛髮作頻率和持續時間,治療期間觀察兩組患者不良反應髮生情況。結果兩組患者臨床療效和心電圖 ST - T 段改善情況比較,差異無統計學意義( u 值分彆為1.883和0.727,P 值分彆為0.060和0.467)。治療前兩組患者心絞痛髮作頻率和持續時間比較,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05);治療後研究組患者心絞痛髮作頻率低于對照組,持續時間短于對照組(P <0.05)。治療期間研究組不良反應髮生率為30.0%,對照組為25.0%,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。結論尼可地爾能有效減少頑固性心絞痛患者心絞痛髮作頻率,縮短心絞痛持續時間,且安全性較高,但其改善心電圖 ST - T 段效果不明顯。
목적:탐토니가지이대완고성심교통환자심교통발작급심전도 ST - T 단적영향。방법선취효감시중심의원2012년4월—2015년4월수치적완고성심교통환자80례,근거치료방법불동분위연구조화대조조,각40례。량조환자균급여기출치료,연구조환자급여니가지이치료,대조조환자급여안위제치료,량조환자균이4주위1개료정。비교량조환자림상료효화심전도 ST - T 단개선정황,치료전후심교통발작빈솔화지속시간,치료기간관찰량조환자불량반응발생정황。결과량조환자림상료효화심전도 ST - T 단개선정황비교,차이무통계학의의( u 치분별위1.883화0.727,P 치분별위0.060화0.467)。치료전량조환자심교통발작빈솔화지속시간비교,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05);치료후연구조환자심교통발작빈솔저우대조조,지속시간단우대조조(P <0.05)。치료기간연구조불량반응발생솔위30.0%,대조조위25.0%,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。결론니가지이능유효감소완고성심교통환자심교통발작빈솔,축단심교통지속시간,차안전성교고,단기개선심전도 ST - T 단효과불명현。
Objective To investigate the impact of nicorandil on angina pectoris attacks and ECG ST - T segment in patients with intractable angina pectoris. Methods A total of 80 patients with intractable angina pectoris were selected in the Central Hospital of Xiaogan from April 2012 to April 2015,and they were divided into control group and study group according to different therapeutic methods,each of 40 cases. Based on basic treatment,patients of control group were given placebo,while patients of study group were given nicorandil,both groups treated for 4 weeks as a course. Clinical effect,ECG ST - T segment improvement effect,attack frequency and duration of angina pectoris before and after treatment were compared between the two groups,and incidence of adverse reactions during treatment was observed. Results No statistically significant differences of clinical effect or ECG ST - T segment improvement effect was found between the two groups(u = 1. 883,0. 727;P = 0. 060, 0. 467). No statistically significant differences of attack frequency or duration of angina pectoris was found between the two groups before treatment(P > 0. 05);after treatment,attack frequency of study group was statistically significantly lower than that of control group,and duration of angina pectoris of study group was statistically significantly shorter than that of control group(P <0. 05). The incidence of adverse reactions of control group was 25. 0% ,that of study group was 30. 0% ,the difference was not statistically significantly different( P > 0. 05). Conclusion Nicorandil can effectively reduce the attack frequency of angina pectoris,shorten the duration of angina pectoris,and is safe,but its ECG ST - T segment improvement effect is not obviously effective.