中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
29期
34-36
,共3页
曹建明%张庆喜%尹志改%陈树波%王福川
曹建明%張慶喜%尹誌改%陳樹波%王福川
조건명%장경희%윤지개%진수파%왕복천
骨搬移技术%胫骨感染性骨缺损及骨不连患者%治疗效果
骨搬移技術%脛骨感染性骨缺損及骨不連患者%治療效果
골반이기술%경골감염성골결손급골불련환자%치료효과
Bone transport technique%Patients with infected tibial bone defect and nonunion%Treatment effect
目的:探究骨搬移技术在治疗胫骨感染性骨缺损及骨不连患者中的治疗效果。方法整群选取该院自2013年8月—2014年10月接收治疗的70例患者资料进行分析,依据患者入院治疗的先后顺序分为两组,每组35例。对照组采用常规的手术治疗方法,实验组则采用骨搬移技术进行治疗,对两组患者治疗效果等各项指标进行分析比较。结果实验组治疗总有效率为94.3%高于对照组(85.7%)(P<0.05);实验组的出血量为(100.5±6.8)mL,手术时间为(66.2±8.6)min,住院时间为(11.9±3.6)d,优于对照组(P<0.05);实验组,1例出现并发症低于对照组(9例)(P<0.05)。结论在临床工作中,采用骨搬移技术治疗胫骨感染性骨缺损及骨不连可取得较好的治疗效果,值得推广。
目的:探究骨搬移技術在治療脛骨感染性骨缺損及骨不連患者中的治療效果。方法整群選取該院自2013年8月—2014年10月接收治療的70例患者資料進行分析,依據患者入院治療的先後順序分為兩組,每組35例。對照組採用常規的手術治療方法,實驗組則採用骨搬移技術進行治療,對兩組患者治療效果等各項指標進行分析比較。結果實驗組治療總有效率為94.3%高于對照組(85.7%)(P<0.05);實驗組的齣血量為(100.5±6.8)mL,手術時間為(66.2±8.6)min,住院時間為(11.9±3.6)d,優于對照組(P<0.05);實驗組,1例齣現併髮癥低于對照組(9例)(P<0.05)。結論在臨床工作中,採用骨搬移技術治療脛骨感染性骨缺損及骨不連可取得較好的治療效果,值得推廣。
목적:탐구골반이기술재치료경골감염성골결손급골불련환자중적치료효과。방법정군선취해원자2013년8월—2014년10월접수치료적70례환자자료진행분석,의거환자입원치료적선후순서분위량조,매조35례。대조조채용상규적수술치료방법,실험조칙채용골반이기술진행치료,대량조환자치료효과등각항지표진행분석비교。결과실험조치료총유효솔위94.3%고우대조조(85.7%)(P<0.05);실험조적출혈량위(100.5±6.8)mL,수술시간위(66.2±8.6)min,주원시간위(11.9±3.6)d,우우대조조(P<0.05);실험조,1례출현병발증저우대조조(9례)(P<0.05)。결론재림상공작중,채용골반이기술치료경골감염성골결손급골불련가취득교호적치료효과,치득추엄。
Objective To explore the treatment effect of bone transport technique on patients with infected tibial bone de-fect and nonunion. Methods An analysis was conducted on the data of 70 cases admitted in our hospital from August 2013 to October 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, the control group and the experimental group in accordance with the order of admission. The control group were given the conventional treatment, while the experimental group were treated by bone transport technique. And the indicators related to the treatment effect of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The overall response rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group(94.3%vs 85.7%) (P<0.05). The amount of bleeding was (100.5±6.8)mL, duration of operation was (66.2±8.6)min, length of stay was (11.9±3.6)d in the experimental group, which was less than that in the control group, respectively (P<0.05). The number of patients with complications was less in the experimental group than that in the control group (1 case vs 9 cases) (P<0.05). Conclusion For the clinical treatment of infected tibial bone defect and nonunion, bone transport technique can achieve better therapeutic effect, so it is worthy of promotion.