当代护士(下旬刊)
噹代護士(下旬刊)
당대호사(하순간)
Today Nurse
2015年
11期
3-4,5
,共3页
电动吸引装置%急性中毒%注射器%洗胃法
電動吸引裝置%急性中毒%註射器%洗胃法
전동흡인장치%급성중독%주사기%세위법
Electric Suction Device%Acute Poisoning%Syringe%Gastric Lavage Method
目的:探讨电动吸引装置在急性中毒患者洗胃中的价值。方法将60例急性中毒患者按随机数字法分为电动吸引组、注射器组和电机组各20例。观察组采用电动吸引装置进行,注射器组采用传统的注射器洗胃法,电机组采用传统电动机洗胃法。比较三组洗胃时间及洗胃液出入量、胃黏膜损伤发生率、灌洗液返流情况、毒物清除率等。结果观察组洗胃时间、每次洗胃的出入量、胃黏膜损伤发生率、灌洗液返流发生率均优于注射器组( t=2.214,t=3.147,χ2=9.674,χ2=6.674,P<0.05),观察组与传统组间对比无明显差异;观察组毒物清除率优于注射器组(χ2=4.314,P<0.05),观察组毒物清除率大于电机组,但两者比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论电动吸引装置用于洗胃中具有极大的临床价值,值得临床推广。
目的:探討電動吸引裝置在急性中毒患者洗胃中的價值。方法將60例急性中毒患者按隨機數字法分為電動吸引組、註射器組和電機組各20例。觀察組採用電動吸引裝置進行,註射器組採用傳統的註射器洗胃法,電機組採用傳統電動機洗胃法。比較三組洗胃時間及洗胃液齣入量、胃黏膜損傷髮生率、灌洗液返流情況、毒物清除率等。結果觀察組洗胃時間、每次洗胃的齣入量、胃黏膜損傷髮生率、灌洗液返流髮生率均優于註射器組( t=2.214,t=3.147,χ2=9.674,χ2=6.674,P<0.05),觀察組與傳統組間對比無明顯差異;觀察組毒物清除率優于註射器組(χ2=4.314,P<0.05),觀察組毒物清除率大于電機組,但兩者比較無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論電動吸引裝置用于洗胃中具有極大的臨床價值,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토전동흡인장치재급성중독환자세위중적개치。방법장60례급성중독환자안수궤수자법분위전동흡인조、주사기조화전궤조각20례。관찰조채용전동흡인장치진행,주사기조채용전통적주사기세위법,전궤조채용전통전동궤세위법。비교삼조세위시간급세위액출입량、위점막손상발생솔、관세액반류정황、독물청제솔등。결과관찰조세위시간、매차세위적출입량、위점막손상발생솔、관세액반류발생솔균우우주사기조( t=2.214,t=3.147,χ2=9.674,χ2=6.674,P<0.05),관찰조여전통조간대비무명현차이;관찰조독물청제솔우우주사기조(χ2=4.314,P<0.05),관찰조독물청제솔대우전궤조,단량자비교무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론전동흡인장치용우세위중구유겁대적림상개치,치득림상추엄。
Abstrca t Objectiev To explore the value of electric suction device in the gastric lavage in patients with acute poisoning.Methods 60 patients with acute poisoning according to the method of random Numbers were divided into electric suction group, syringes and electrical unit 20 cases each.Observation group uses electric device to attract, injector group adopts the traditional syringe method of gastric lavage, electric unit adopts the traditional method of electric machine wash the stomach.Compare three sets of washing time and washing stomach gastric juice intake, incidence of gastric mucosa damage, lavage reflux condition, toxin clearance, etc.Results Gastric lavage time observing group, gas-tric lavage in quantity every time, incidence of gastric mucosa damage, lavage reflux incidence were superior to a syringe ( t=2.214, t=3. 147,χ2=9.674, χ2 =6.674, P<0.05 ) , compared to no significant difference between observation group and traditional group; the observation group toxin clearance is superior to the syringe(χ2=4.314, P<0.05) , the observation group toxin clearance is greater than the power unit, but the difference is not significant ( P>0.05) .Conclusion There are great clinical value about electric suction device used in gastric lavage, it is worthy of clinical promotion.