CAJ | 학술논문

学衡派与新文化派共同参与了近代中国最重要的伦理启蒙。两派伦理论争的核心在于伦理精神的不同，这源于各自不同的世界观、人性论和价值观。新文化派持进化论、唯物论以及科学的世界观，认为人性自然，趋乐避苦，人人都有满足人性欲求的自由，自由即是新的伦理精神。学衡派坚持“一”“多”融合的世界观和善恶二元的人性论。主张以理制欲，归于“中道”的伦理精神，认为新文化派的主张使人流于自然，堕于禽兽。两派均未忽略伦理精神的“中道”性质，但因批判对象不同而有所侧重，从而导致某种失衡。虽然两派的伦理精神具有互补性，但救亡压倒启蒙的现实，致使中国伦理精神的近代转型在新文化派的主导下失去了应有的平衡，甚至分裂。今天的伦理困境就源于这伦理精神的分裂。
학형파여신문화파공동삼여료근대중국최중요적윤리계몽。량파윤리논쟁적핵심재우윤리정신적불동，저원우각자불동적세계관、인성론화개치관。신문화파지진화론、유물론이급과학적세계관，인위인성자연，추악피고，인인도유만족인성욕구적자유，자유즉시신적윤리정신。학형파견지“일”“다”융합적세계관화선악이원적인성론。주장이리제욕，귀우“중도”적윤리정신，인위신문화파적주장사인류우자연，타우금수。량파균미홀략윤리정신적“중도”성질，단인비판대상불동이유소측중，종이도치모충실형。수연량파적윤리정신구유호보성，단구망압도계몽적현실，치사중국윤리정신적근대전형재신문화파적주도하실거료응유적평형，심지분렬。금천적윤리곤경취원우저윤리정신적분렬。
Both the Xueheng School and the New Culture School participated in the most important ethical enlightenment in modern China. And the core of their debate lay in their different ethical spirits, which stemmed from their different views of the world, human nature and values. The New Culture School held evolution, materialism and scientific worldview. They pursued happiness and avoid suffering, believing that human nature is natural, that everyone has the freedom to meet the natural desires, and that the freedom is new ethical spirit. The Xueheng School, on the other hand, adhered to dialectical worldview between“one”and“many”as well as the duality of human nature between good and evil. They advocated the ethical spirit that desire should be limited to the Mean. They criticized the idea of the New Culture School in that it made people degenerated like animals. Both sides did not ignore the Mean of ethical spirit, but their different critical objects and focuses led to some imbalance. Although both ethical spirits were complementarity, the modern transformation of Chinese ethical spirit lost its balance under the dominance of the New Culture School and even split, owing to the reality of Salvation overpowering Enlightenment. And the ethical dilemma at the present originates from such division of ethical spirits.