CAJ | 학술논문

刑事裁判文书说理主要包括定性论证、量刑论证、总结性意见和对控辩双方不同意见的采纳说明以及引用法律条文等内容。随着社会法治的进步，社会公众法律意识不断提高，人们不再只满足于裁决结果，而更加迫切想知道“为什么”。作为基层人民法院，受理的刑事案件类型相对较集中。同种犯罪案件发案率逐年提高。当同一类型案件出现不同裁决结果时，法院则处在被动地位。在司法公开的今天，裁判文书必然公开的要求，倒逼刑事裁判文书提高质量，具备完善的说理。
형사재판문서설리주요포괄정성론증、양형론증、총결성의견화대공변쌍방불동의견적채납설명이급인용법률조문등내용。수착사회법치적진보，사회공음법률의식불단제고，인문불재지만족우재결결과，이경가박절상지도“위십요”。작위기층인민법원，수리적형사안건류형상대교집중。동충범죄안건발안솔축년제고。당동일류형안건출현불동재결결과시，법원칙처재피동지위。재사법공개적금천，재판문서필연공개적요구，도핍형사재판문서제고질량，구비완선적설리。
Criminal magistrate instrument reasoning mainly includes qualitative argument, sentencing argument, concluding com?ments and views on both parties to adopt a different explanation and cited legal provisions and so on. With progress of society under the rule of law, and constant improvement of public awareness of the law, people are no longer content with verdict, and more eager to know “why.” As grassroots people’ s courts, the type of criminal cases accepted is relatively unified. Same kind of crimes is in?creasing year by year. When the same type of cases gives different verdicts, the Court is put in the passive position. In today's open justice, the inevitable requirement for judgment document disclosure forces to improve the quality of criminal justice instruments with a sound reasoning.