CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨腔静脉滤器（VCF）Gunther Tulip和Cook Celcet回收的合适时机。方法2013年3月至2015年4月胜利油田中心医院共为58例患者施行VCF植入术,其中植入Gunther Tulip 和Cook Celcet分别为13例和31例,有21例患者遵嘱在3个月内复诊接受回收术。结果21例患者中19例VCF顺利回收,Gunther Tulip（平均植入54.4 d,最长79 d）顺利回收3例,失败2例；Cook Celcet（平均植入37.6 d,最长67 d）顺利回收16例,回收成功率100%。结论尽管有较多VCF长时间留置仍能安全回收的病例,但尽早行回收术有助于提高VCF回收率。 Cook Celcet似乎是更好的选择,但较昂贵。
목적：탐토강정맥려기（VCF）Gunther Tulip화Cook Celcet회수적합괄시궤。방법2013년3월지2015년4월성리유전중심의원공위58례환자시행VCF식입술,기중식입Gunther Tulip 화Cook Celcet분별위13례화31례,유21례환자준촉재3개월내복진접수회수술。결과21례환자중19례VCF순리회수,Gunther Tulip（평균식입54.4 d,최장79 d）순리회수3례,실패2례；Cook Celcet（평균식입37.6 d,최장67 d）순리회수16례,회수성공솔100%。결론진관유교다VCF장시간류치잉능안전회수적병례,단진조행회수술유조우제고VCF회수솔。 Cook Celcet사호시경호적선택,단교앙귀。
Objective To discuss the optimal retrieval time of the indwelling Gunther Tulip and Cook Celcet inferior vena cava filters (VCF). Methods During the period from March 2013 to April 2015 at Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, the implantation of retrievable inferior vena cava filter was performed in 58 patients. Among the 58 patients, Gunther Tulip VCF was used in 13 and Cook Celcet VCF was employed in 31. Twenty-one patients followed the doctor's advice to receive retrieval procedure of VCF within three months after the implantation. Results Among the 21 patients, successful retrieval of VCF was obtained in 19. The mean indwelling time of Gunther Tulip VCF was 54.4 days, the longest time being 79.0 days. Gunther Tulip VCF was successfully removed in 3 patients and retrieval of VCF failed in 2 patients, with a retrieval success rate of 60%. The mean indwelling time of Cook Celcet VCF was 37.6 days, the longest time being 67.0 days. Cook Celcet VCF was successfully removed in 16 patients, with the success rate of retrieval being 100%. Conclusion Despite many VCFs that have been indwelled for a long time can be safely retrieved, retrieval procedure should be performed as early as possible in order to improve the retrieval success rate of VCF. It seems that the use of Cook Celcet VCF is a better choice although it is more expensive.