中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2015年
28期
2131-2134
,共4页
林媛%蒋争妍%何冬凝%苏静
林媛%蔣爭妍%何鼕凝%囌靜
림원%장쟁연%하동응%소정
糖尿病足%护理%刮匙与剥丝法
糖尿病足%護理%颳匙與剝絲法
당뇨병족%호리%괄시여박사법
Diabetic foot%Nursing care%Curette and stripping wire method
目的 观察刮匙与剥丝换药法在糖尿病足护理中应用的临床效果.方法 选取36例住院诊断为糖尿病足的患者,采用随机数字表法分为实验组18例和对照组18例. 实验组采用内科治疗加刮匙与剥丝法换药治疗;对照组采用内科治疗加常规换药治疗.比较2组在肉芽组织成熟度、创面愈合速度和疗效方面的差异. 结果 实验组在第10天创面肉芽组织成熟度达"++"和"+++"有10例,对照组4例;实验组在第10天和第14天创面愈合速度分别是(78.6±10.5)%和(82.7±8.4)%,对照组是(43.2±8.7)%和(66.2±10.1)%;治疗4周后实验组治愈率为14/18,无效率为0;对照组治愈率为6/18,无效率为3/18. 结论 刮匙与剥丝法是一种良好的促进糖尿病足创面愈合的换药方法,其疗效优于传统方法,值得临床推广应用.
目的 觀察颳匙與剝絲換藥法在糖尿病足護理中應用的臨床效果.方法 選取36例住院診斷為糖尿病足的患者,採用隨機數字錶法分為實驗組18例和對照組18例. 實驗組採用內科治療加颳匙與剝絲法換藥治療;對照組採用內科治療加常規換藥治療.比較2組在肉芽組織成熟度、創麵愈閤速度和療效方麵的差異. 結果 實驗組在第10天創麵肉芽組織成熟度達"++"和"+++"有10例,對照組4例;實驗組在第10天和第14天創麵愈閤速度分彆是(78.6±10.5)%和(82.7±8.4)%,對照組是(43.2±8.7)%和(66.2±10.1)%;治療4週後實驗組治愈率為14/18,無效率為0;對照組治愈率為6/18,無效率為3/18. 結論 颳匙與剝絲法是一種良好的促進糖尿病足創麵愈閤的換藥方法,其療效優于傳統方法,值得臨床推廣應用.
목적 관찰괄시여박사환약법재당뇨병족호리중응용적림상효과.방법 선취36례주원진단위당뇨병족적환자,채용수궤수자표법분위실험조18례화대조조18례. 실험조채용내과치료가괄시여박사법환약치료;대조조채용내과치료가상규환약치료.비교2조재육아조직성숙도、창면유합속도화료효방면적차이. 결과 실험조재제10천창면육아조직성숙도체"++"화"+++"유10례,대조조4례;실험조재제10천화제14천창면유합속도분별시(78.6±10.5)%화(82.7±8.4)%,대조조시(43.2±8.7)%화(66.2±10.1)%;치료4주후실험조치유솔위14/18,무효솔위0;대조조치유솔위6/18,무효솔위3/18. 결론 괄시여박사법시일충량호적촉진당뇨병족창면유합적환약방법,기료효우우전통방법,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy using curette and stripping wire method in treating diabetic foot. Methods 36 hospitalized patients diagnosed as diabetic foot were enrolled, and 18 of them were chosen as the experimental group according to random digital table method who was treated with medical therapy plus curette and stripping wire method in treating diabetic foot. The other 18 patients were named as the control group who were treated by medical treatment and routine treatment. The granulation tissue maturity, wound healing, and the differences on curative effect were compared. Results 10 cases′wound granulation tissue maturity in the experimental group got"++"and"+++"on the 10th day while 4 cases in control group. Wound healing rate of the experimental group at the 10th and 14th day were (78.6±10.5)%and (82.7±8.4)%while the control group were (43.2±8.7)%and (66.2±10.1)%. Cure rate of the experimental group was 14/18 four weeks after treatment, the inefficiency was 0, while the control group was 6/18 and 3/18. Conclusions Curette and stripping wire method is a good method to promote the dressing diabetic foot wound healing. It is superior to traditional methods, worthy of clinical application.