中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
Medical Journal of Chinese People's Health
2015年
20期
91-93
,共3页
程正祥%冯纳婷%甘景梨%梁学军%高存友%段惠峰
程正祥%馮納婷%甘景梨%樑學軍%高存友%段惠峰
정정상%풍납정%감경리%량학군%고존우%단혜봉
住院军人%个性特征%社会支持%应对方式%认知方式%心理状况
住院軍人%箇性特徵%社會支持%應對方式%認知方式%心理狀況
주원군인%개성특정%사회지지%응대방식%인지방식%심리상황
Hospitalized soldiers%Personality characteristic%Social support%Coping style%Cognitive style%Psychological status
目的::探讨住院军人心理健康状况及人格特征、社会支持、应对方式和认知方式特征。方法:采用90项症状清单( SCL-90)、简易应对方式问卷、艾森克人格问卷、社会支持量表( SSRS)和认知方式问卷对196名住院军人和202名地方住院患者进行问卷调查。结果:①住院军人同地方患者比较,强迫、人际敏感和焦虑因子高于地方患者,躯体化和敌对因子低于地方患者(P<0.05或0.01);②住院军人消极应对、神经质(N)和认知方式得分明显高于地方患者,而精神质(P)和客观支持得分明显低于地方患者(P<0.05或0.01);③回归分析显示, SCL-90总分有显著性影响的因素由大到小依次为客观支持、认知方式、消极应对和病种。结论:住院军人心理健康状况同地方患者有一定差别,具备军人独有的特征,主要受应对方式、认知方式、社会支持以及疾病种类的综合影响。
目的::探討住院軍人心理健康狀況及人格特徵、社會支持、應對方式和認知方式特徵。方法:採用90項癥狀清單( SCL-90)、簡易應對方式問捲、艾森剋人格問捲、社會支持量錶( SSRS)和認知方式問捲對196名住院軍人和202名地方住院患者進行問捲調查。結果:①住院軍人同地方患者比較,彊迫、人際敏感和焦慮因子高于地方患者,軀體化和敵對因子低于地方患者(P<0.05或0.01);②住院軍人消極應對、神經質(N)和認知方式得分明顯高于地方患者,而精神質(P)和客觀支持得分明顯低于地方患者(P<0.05或0.01);③迴歸分析顯示, SCL-90總分有顯著性影響的因素由大到小依次為客觀支持、認知方式、消極應對和病種。結論:住院軍人心理健康狀況同地方患者有一定差彆,具備軍人獨有的特徵,主要受應對方式、認知方式、社會支持以及疾病種類的綜閤影響。
목적::탐토주원군인심리건강상황급인격특정、사회지지、응대방식화인지방식특정。방법:채용90항증상청단( SCL-90)、간역응대방식문권、애삼극인격문권、사회지지량표( SSRS)화인지방식문권대196명주원군인화202명지방주원환자진행문권조사。결과:①주원군인동지방환자비교,강박、인제민감화초필인자고우지방환자,구체화화활대인자저우지방환자(P<0.05혹0.01);②주원군인소겁응대、신경질(N)화인지방식득분명현고우지방환자,이정신질(P)화객관지지득분명현저우지방환자(P<0.05혹0.01);③회귀분석현시, SCL-90총분유현저성영향적인소유대도소의차위객관지지、인지방식、소겁응대화병충。결론:주원군인심리건강상황동지방환자유일정차별,구비군인독유적특정,주요수응대방식、인지방식、사회지지이급질병충류적종합영향。
Objective:To investigate psychological status and personality characteristics, social support, coping style and cog-nitive style features of hospitalized soldiers. Methods:196 hospitalized soldiers and 202 civilian hospitalized patients were investigated by using the 90 symptom checklist ( SCL-90 ) , simplified coping style questionnaire ( SCSQ ) , Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ), social support scale (SSRS) and cognitive style questionnaire (CVD). Results:(1) Comparing the hospitalized soldiers to the civilian hospitalized patients:the factors of force, interpersonal sensitivity and anxiety were higher, but somatization and hostility factors were lower (P<0. 05 or 0. 01). (2) Comparing the hospitalized soldiers to the civilian hospitalized patients:scores of negative coping, neuroticism ( N) and cognitive style were significantly higher than the latter, while the scores of psychoticism ( P) and objec-tive support were significantly lower (P<0. 05 or 0. 01). (3) Regression analysis showed that, the significant influencing factors to the aggregate score of SCL-90 from big to small were objective support, cognitive style, negative coping and diseases. Conclusions:Cer-tain differences are found between the mental health statuses of the hospitalized soldiers with the civilian hospitalized patients, and the soldiers' unique characteristics come from the comprehensive effects of the coping style, cognitive style, social support and diseases.