航空航天医学杂志
航空航天醫學雜誌
항공항천의학잡지
Journal of Aerospace Medicine
2015年
9期
1049-1050
,共2页
胺碘酮%利多卡因%心肌梗死%室性心律失常
胺碘酮%利多卡因%心肌梗死%室性心律失常
알전동%리다잡인%심기경사%실성심률실상
amiodarone%lidocaine%myocardial infarction%ventricular arrhythmias
目的 探讨胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗心肌梗死患者并发室性心律失常的临床疗效.方法 选取2014年2月~2014年8月收治的急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常患者94例,随机分为观察组和对照组各47例.观察组给予胺碘酮联合利多卡因治疗,对照组仅给予利多卡因治疗.比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应发生率.结果观察组治疗总有效率为93.61%,对照组治疗总有效率为80.85%,观察组总有效率明显高于对照组( P<0.05 );观察组不良反应发生率为12.78%,对照组不良反应发生率为10.65%,组间比较无显著性( P>0.05 ).结论胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗心肌梗死患者并发室性心律失常疗效显著,安全性高.
目的 探討胺碘酮與利多卡因治療心肌梗死患者併髮室性心律失常的臨床療效.方法 選取2014年2月~2014年8月收治的急性心肌梗死併室性心律失常患者94例,隨機分為觀察組和對照組各47例.觀察組給予胺碘酮聯閤利多卡因治療,對照組僅給予利多卡因治療.比較兩組的臨床療效及不良反應髮生率.結果觀察組治療總有效率為93.61%,對照組治療總有效率為80.85%,觀察組總有效率明顯高于對照組( P<0.05 );觀察組不良反應髮生率為12.78%,對照組不良反應髮生率為10.65%,組間比較無顯著性( P>0.05 ).結論胺碘酮與利多卡因治療心肌梗死患者併髮室性心律失常療效顯著,安全性高.
목적 탐토알전동여리다잡인치료심기경사환자병발실성심률실상적림상료효.방법 선취2014년2월~2014년8월수치적급성심기경사병실성심률실상환자94례,수궤분위관찰조화대조조각47례.관찰조급여알전동연합리다잡인치료,대조조부급여리다잡인치료.비교량조적림상료효급불량반응발생솔.결과관찰조치료총유효솔위93.61%,대조조치료총유효솔위80.85%,관찰조총유효솔명현고우대조조( P<0.05 );관찰조불량반응발생솔위12.78%,대조조불량반응발생솔위10.65%,조간비교무현저성( P>0.05 ).결론알전동여리다잡인치료심기경사환자병발실성심률실상료효현저,안전성고.
O bjective To observe the clinical effects of amiodarone and lidocaine on ventricular arrhythmias after a-cute myocardial infarction.Methods The clinical data of 94 patients who underwent ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction in Liaoning Provincial People's Hospital during February 2014 and August 2014 were collected,the whole patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group,each group contained 47 cases.The observation group was given amiodarone and lidocaine treatment,the control group was given lidocaine treatment.The clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were observed.Results The total effective rate in the observation group(93.61%) was significantly higher than in control group(80.85%),there were significant differ-ences between the two groups ( P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 12.78%,the incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 10.65%,there were no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusions Curative effect is dependable for amiodarone and lidocaine for ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction.