CAJ | 학술논문

刑事庭前会议上如何处理程序性争议,我国立法规定较为模糊.我国司法实践中已出现了庭前会议的听证模式,庭前会议被作为一种专门的程序性争议解决程序,控辩双方可就非法证据排除等程序性争议展开对抗、辩论,法官居中裁判.与我国目前立法中的程序性争议解决机制相比,听证模式下的庭前会议是一种更优的选择.庭前会议听证模式应发展成为一种专门解决"排非"等程序性争议的庭前听证程序,并以被告人的人权保障为核心构建相关具体规则.
형사정전회의상여하처리정서성쟁의,아국입법규정교위모호.아국사법실천중이출현료정전회의적은증모식,정전회의피작위일충전문적정서성쟁의해결정서,공변쌍방가취비법증거배제등정서성쟁의전개대항、변론,법관거중재판.여아국목전입법중적정서성쟁의해결궤제상비,은증모식하적정전회의시일충경우적선택.정전회의은증모식응발전성위일충전문해결"배비"등정서성쟁의적정전은증정서,병이피고인적인권보장위핵심구건상관구체규칙.
China's Criminal Procedural Law is unclear about how to resolve procedural disputes in the criminal pretrial conference. It is found that the hearing model in the criminal pretrial conference has been practiced in China's judicial practice. Being a special procedure for resolving procedural disputes, the prosecution and defense can confront and argue on issues such as illegal evidence exclusion, and the judge make decisions as an impartial party. Compared with the mechanism for resolving procedural disputes in the present legislation, this model is a better choice. In the future, this hearing model should be developed into a special pretrial hearing for resolving procedural disputes, especially for suppression issue, and relevant rules should be made centering on the protection of defendants' human rights.