CAJ | 학술논문

本文首先着力分析了英美法系下“所有权”的含义，通过与传统大陆民法体系下的所有权比较，辨析了两大法系下所有权并非是同一层面的概念，不能以传统民法财产权体系去分析双重所有权。然后以英美财产法的视角，通过考察信托起源和分析英美财产法的特质，解释了两大法系下所有权之所以不同的缘由。最后简略分析了两大法系财产法追求的功能应当是相似的，进而提出以功能面向看待大陆法系国家引入信托制度的意义，发挥出信托在不同维度上创设分割自由灵活的财产权的制度优势。
본문수선착력분석료영미법계하“소유권”적함의，통과여전통대륙민법체계하적소유권비교，변석료량대법계하소유권병비시동일층면적개념，불능이전통민법재산권체계거분석쌍중소유권。연후이영미재산법적시각，통과고찰신탁기원화분석영미재산법적특질，해석료량대법계하소유권지소이불동적연유。최후간략분석료량대법계재산법추구적공능응당시상사적，진이제출이공능면향간대대륙법계국가인입신탁제도적의의，발휘출신탁재불동유도상창설분할자유령활적재산권적제도우세。
The concept of ownership of trust property is different under the two major legal systems . Therefore ,analyzing the dual ownership under the traditional civil law system is improper . In the perspective of property law ,investigating the origin of trust and analyzing characteristics of the property under Anglo‐American law system may ,to some extent ,explain the difference of concept of ownership under the two major legal systems .While the purpose of the two law systems might be similar ,civil law countries should take full advantage of trust’s ability of creating flexible property rights and introduce trust systems from a functional standpoint .