CAJ | 학술논문

对于构式“V＋P＋N”结构类型的划分，学界存在较大的争议，有的认为宜分析作动补结构，有的认为宜分析作动宾结构。在生成语法看来，两者都具合理性，前者反映了句法的选择关系，后者是句法调整的体现。个体的语感存在差异，对于接受高位置句法移位的说话人来讲，存在“V＋P＋了＋N”，否则不存在。
대우구식“V＋P＋N”결구류형적화분，학계존재교대적쟁의，유적인위의분석작동보결구，유적인위의분석작동빈결구。재생성어법간래，량자도구합이성，전자반영료구법적선택관계，후자시구법조정적체현。개체적어감존재차이，대우접수고위치구법이위적설화인래강，존재“V＋P＋료＋N”，부칙불존재。
There are some disputes in the structure analysis of the construction“V+P+N”,i .e .,some think that it is ap‐propriate to analyze it as“V-Complement”structure ,and others think it is“V-Object”structure .Both of them are reasonable from the perspective of UG .The former is the reflection of syntactic choice ,and the later is refection of the syntactic adjustment . Because of the variety of the language sense for the individual ,as to the speaker who accept the high position movement ,the con‐struction of“V+P+了+N”is acceptable ,otherwise not .