中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
32期
12-13
,共2页
儿童哮喘%持续性%间歇性%雾化吸入%布地奈德
兒童哮喘%持續性%間歇性%霧化吸入%佈地奈德
인동효천%지속성%간헐성%무화흡입%포지내덕
Asthma in children%Persistence%Intermittent%Atomization inhalation%Budesonide
目的：比较、分析每天持续和间歇性雾化吸入布地奈德预防儿童哮喘发作的疗效。方法：收治儿童哮喘患儿88例，随机分成A组45例和B组43例，对B组患儿给予持续雾化吸入布地奈德，对A组患儿给予间歇性雾化吸入布地奈德。结果：两组比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论：布地奈德每天持续和间歇性雾化吸入预防儿童哮喘发作临床疗效差异不显著，均可作为预防儿童哮喘发作的重要措施。
目的：比較、分析每天持續和間歇性霧化吸入佈地奈德預防兒童哮喘髮作的療效。方法：收治兒童哮喘患兒88例，隨機分成A組45例和B組43例，對B組患兒給予持續霧化吸入佈地奈德，對A組患兒給予間歇性霧化吸入佈地奈德。結果：兩組比較，差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05)。結論：佈地奈德每天持續和間歇性霧化吸入預防兒童哮喘髮作臨床療效差異不顯著，均可作為預防兒童哮喘髮作的重要措施。
목적：비교、분석매천지속화간헐성무화흡입포지내덕예방인동효천발작적료효。방법：수치인동효천환인88례，수궤분성A조45례화B조43례，대B조환인급여지속무화흡입포지내덕，대A조환인급여간헐성무화흡입포지내덕。결과：량조비교，차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05)。결론：포지내덕매천지속화간헐성무화흡입예방인동효천발작림상료효차이불현저，균가작위예방인동효천발작적중요조시。
Objective:To compare the efficacy of every continuous and intermittent budesonide atomization inhalation to prevent asthma in children.Methods:88 cases of hospitalized children with asthma were selected,they were randomly divided into the A group(n=45) and the B group(n=43),the B group were given continuous inhalation of budesonide,the A group of children were given intermittent inhalation of budesonide.Results:There was no statistical significance between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:The clinical curative effect difference of budesonide and continued daily and intermittent atomization inhalation in preventing asthma exacerbations in children was not significant,that can be used as an important measure to prevent the exacerbation of asthma in children.
