安顺学院学报
安順學院學報
안순학원학보
Journal of Anshun University
2015年
5期
103-104,111
,共3页
公民%环境公益诉讼%原告资格
公民%環境公益訴訟%原告資格
공민%배경공익소송%원고자격
citizen%environmental PIL%plaintiff qualification
基于滥诉的担忧,现行立法并没有授予公民环境公益诉讼原告主体资格。实际上,授予公民环境公益诉讼原告主体资格并不会导致滥诉的发生,公民享有环境公益诉讼原告资格,有着合理的理论基础和现实的法律依据,是环境公益诉讼制度的精髓所在,是公民环境管理权、监督权的体现和保障,是符合法理和实践的理性选择。
基于濫訴的擔憂,現行立法併沒有授予公民環境公益訴訟原告主體資格。實際上,授予公民環境公益訴訟原告主體資格併不會導緻濫訴的髮生,公民享有環境公益訴訟原告資格,有著閤理的理論基礎和現實的法律依據,是環境公益訴訟製度的精髓所在,是公民環境管理權、鑑督權的體現和保障,是符閤法理和實踐的理性選擇。
기우람소적담우,현행입법병몰유수여공민배경공익소송원고주체자격。실제상,수여공민배경공익소송원고주체자격병불회도치람소적발생,공민향유배경공익소송원고자격,유착합리적이론기출화현실적법률의거,시배경공익소송제도적정수소재,시공민배경관리권、감독권적체현화보장,시부합법리화실천적이성선택。
Based on concerns about frivolous lawsuits ,the current legislation does not grant citizens the plaintiff standing of‐environmental public interest litigation(PIL) ,which as a matter of fact ,would not lead to abuse complaints .Theoretically and practically speaking ,citizens’ qualification of plaintiff standing of civil environmental public interest litigation is the essence of the environmental PIL system ,the embodiment and guarantee of people’s right in environmental supervision as well as the rational choicein jurisprudence and practice.