国际放射医学核医学杂志
國際放射醫學覈醫學雜誌
국제방사의학핵의학잡지
International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
2015年
5期
401-404
,共4页
拓飞%张庆%张京%周强%李文红%徐翠华%苏旭
拓飛%張慶%張京%週彊%李文紅%徐翠華%囌旭
탁비%장경%장경%주강%리문홍%서취화%소욱
放射性同位素%质量控制%γ能谱%比对
放射性同位素%質量控製%γ能譜%比對
방사성동위소%질량공제%γ능보%비대
Radioisotopes%Quality control%γ-spectrometry%Intercomparison
目的 提高放射卫生技术服务机构检测人员的技术水平和分析能力,进一步促进全国γ能谱实验室放射性核素检测技术的发展.方法 组织2014年度全国放射性核素γ能谱分析方法比对,比对基质为土壤样品,要求参加比对的单位分析测量样品中放射性核素40K、137Cs、208Tl和228Ac的比活度.结果 提交结果报告的31家比对单位中,比对结果合格的有26家,不合格的有5家,有2家单位的比对结果获得优秀.所有参加比对的单位的整体合格率为84%(26/31),优秀率为6%(2/31).结论 参加比对的多数单位具备较高的检测能力和水平,其出具的检测结果准确可靠.在日常工作中需加强对γ谱仪的维护保养,重视实验室间定期刻度,并注意采用正确的核衰变参数进行计算.
目的 提高放射衛生技術服務機構檢測人員的技術水平和分析能力,進一步促進全國γ能譜實驗室放射性覈素檢測技術的髮展.方法 組織2014年度全國放射性覈素γ能譜分析方法比對,比對基質為土壤樣品,要求參加比對的單位分析測量樣品中放射性覈素40K、137Cs、208Tl和228Ac的比活度.結果 提交結果報告的31傢比對單位中,比對結果閤格的有26傢,不閤格的有5傢,有2傢單位的比對結果穫得優秀.所有參加比對的單位的整體閤格率為84%(26/31),優秀率為6%(2/31).結論 參加比對的多數單位具備較高的檢測能力和水平,其齣具的檢測結果準確可靠.在日常工作中需加彊對γ譜儀的維護保養,重視實驗室間定期刻度,併註意採用正確的覈衰變參數進行計算.
목적 제고방사위생기술복무궤구검측인원적기술수평화분석능력,진일보촉진전국γ능보실험실방사성핵소검측기술적발전.방법 조직2014년도전국방사성핵소γ능보분석방법비대,비대기질위토양양품,요구삼가비대적단위분석측량양품중방사성핵소40K、137Cs、208Tl화228Ac적비활도.결과 제교결과보고적31가비대단위중,비대결과합격적유26가,불합격적유5가,유2가단위적비대결과획득우수.소유삼가비대적단위적정체합격솔위84%(26/31),우수솔위6%(2/31).결론 삼가비대적다수단위구비교고적검측능력화수평,기출구적검측결과준학가고.재일상공작중수가강대γ보의적유호보양,중시실험실간정기각도,병주의채용정학적핵쇠변삼수진행계산.
Objective To improve the technical levels and analytical ability of γ-spectrometry analysts for agencies engaged in radiation measurement and assessment and to promote further advances of monitoring methods for γ-spectrometry analysis laboratories in our nation.Methods A nationwide intercomparison on γ-spectrometry measurement for activity concentration of 40K, 137Cs, 208Tl, and 208Ac in soil was organized in 2014.Results Thirty-one laboratories have participated in this intercomparison.Among these laboratories, 26 laboratories showed "acceptable" results, which include 2 laboratories with "excellent" status, while 5 laboratories showed "unacceptable" results.The production percentages of "acceptable" results and "excellent" status are 84% (24/31) and 6% (2/31), respectively.Conclusions The measurement values reported by most of the laboratories involved in this intercomparison showed a good agreement with the reference values.Therefore, these values may provide a reliable measurement result during measurement in γ-spectrometry analyses.However, proper operation of γ-spectrometers and its regular calibration must be further emphasized to obtain accurate measurements to improve the calculation of nuclear data in some laboratories.