CAJ | 학술논문

对92名参加排球基础课学习的体育专业学生进行练习式、互惠式和包含式教学下的学习结果比较，对学生的发球、垫球和传球技能进行测定，结果显示：练习式教学下男生的平均综合评分显著高于互惠式和包含式教学下的评分（p＜0.01），互惠式和包含式教学下女生的平均综合评分显著高于练习式教学下的评分（p＜0.01），互惠式教学与包含式教学之间学生的平均综合评分无显著性差异．2种性别、3种教学方式与学习结果的2×3独立组方差分析发现，性别—教学方式相互作用对学习结果影响较大，男生的最优教学方式为练习式，女生的最优教学方式为包含式．
대92명삼가배구기출과학습적체육전업학생진행연습식、호혜식화포함식교학하적학습결과비교，대학생적발구、점구화전구기능진행측정，결과현시：연습식교학하남생적평균종합평분현저고우호혜식화포함식교학하적평분（p＜0.01），호혜식화포함식교학하녀생적평균종합평분현저고우연습식교학하적평분（p＜0.01），호혜식교학여포함식교학지간학생적평균종합평분무현저성차이．2충성별、3충교학방식여학습결과적2×3독립조방차분석발현，성별—교학방식상호작용대학습결과영향교대，남생적최우교학방식위연습식，녀생적최우교학방식위포함식．
The study investigated learning effects of 92 students ,who major in physical education ,enrolled in fundamental volleyball skill classes in three teaching models ,such as practice ,reciprocal ,and inclusion style .After eight classes ,passing ,setting ,and serving skills were assessed ,the whole scores on the three aspects constituted a comprehensive score that represented students' learning effects .Results show that the mean comprehensive score of the practice group for man was significantly (p<0 .01) higher than that of the reciprocal and inclusion groups . The mean comprehensive score of the reciprocal and inclusion groups for female was significantly (p<0 .01) higher than that of the practice group ,respectively .No sig-nificant difference in the mean comprehensive score was found between the reciprocal and inclusion groups for all .After analyzing the effects of genders and three teaching styles on the learning effects by analysis of Variance ,the findings indicated that gender/teaching style has a large impact on the learning results ,the best teaching style was practice style for man ,while inclusion style for female .