南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)
南京醫科大學學報(社會科學版)
남경의과대학학보(사회과학판)
Journal of Nanjing Medical University (Social Sciences)
2015年
5期
349-354
,共6页
医疗纠纷%实证研究%对策探讨
醫療糾紛%實證研究%對策探討
의료규분%실증연구%대책탐토
medical disputes%empirical study%discuss on countermeasures
目的:探索医疗纠纷发生的特点和规律’为医疗机构防范医疗纠纷提供参考依据。方法运用一般描述性统计分析方法从纠纷数量年度分布、纠纷个案赔偿金额分布、纠纷在各医疗机构分布、纠纷所涉科室分布、纠纷患者性别、年龄以及纠纷原因构成这七个方面进行分析。结果医疗纠纷数量平稳’三级医院成为“重灾区”;“经济赔偿”是化解纠纷的关键’且以“1~10万元”赔款最为常见;外科是医疗纠纷最为频发的科室;老年患者和少儿患者是医疗纠纷多发人群;对诊疗效果的不满是医疗纠纷的“导火索”。结论三级医院应该加强医疗纠纷防范意识’强调“患者参与”的服务理念;对重点科室及重点人群进行重点防范;提高医护人员专业技术水平和与患者有效沟通的水平;增强医疗纠纷人民调解机制的公信力。
目的:探索醫療糾紛髮生的特點和規律’為醫療機構防範醫療糾紛提供參攷依據。方法運用一般描述性統計分析方法從糾紛數量年度分佈、糾紛箇案賠償金額分佈、糾紛在各醫療機構分佈、糾紛所涉科室分佈、糾紛患者性彆、年齡以及糾紛原因構成這七箇方麵進行分析。結果醫療糾紛數量平穩’三級醫院成為“重災區”;“經濟賠償”是化解糾紛的關鍵’且以“1~10萬元”賠款最為常見;外科是醫療糾紛最為頻髮的科室;老年患者和少兒患者是醫療糾紛多髮人群;對診療效果的不滿是醫療糾紛的“導火索”。結論三級醫院應該加彊醫療糾紛防範意識’彊調“患者參與”的服務理唸;對重點科室及重點人群進行重點防範;提高醫護人員專業技術水平和與患者有效溝通的水平;增彊醫療糾紛人民調解機製的公信力。
목적:탐색의료규분발생적특점화규률’위의료궤구방범의료규분제공삼고의거。방법운용일반묘술성통계분석방법종규분수량년도분포、규분개안배상금액분포、규분재각의료궤구분포、규분소섭과실분포、규분환자성별、년령이급규분원인구성저칠개방면진행분석。결과의료규분수량평은’삼급의원성위“중재구”;“경제배상”시화해규분적관건’차이“1~10만원”배관최위상견;외과시의료규분최위빈발적과실;노년환자화소인환자시의료규분다발인군;대진료효과적불만시의료규분적“도화색”。결론삼급의원응해가강의료규분방범의식’강조“환자삼여”적복무이념;대중점과실급중점인군진행중점방범;제고의호인원전업기술수평화여환자유효구통적수평;증강의료규분인민조해궤제적공신력。
Objective: To explore the characteristic and pattern of medical disputes, so that to provide the basis for medical institutions to prevent medical disputes. Methods: General descriptive statistical analysis was performed to analyze seven aspects, including the number of annual disputes, distribution of compensation amount per case, distribution to various medical institutions, distribution to different departments involved in disputes, gender of patients, age of patients, and cause of disputes. Results: The number of medical disputes was stable, tertiary hospital was “disaster zone”; “economic compensation” was the key point to disputes resolution with indemnity number ranged mainly from 1 to 100 000 Yuan; the department of surgery ranked top 1 in frequency; elderly and children patients were the main group involved in dispute; dissatisfaction with the effect of diagnosis and treatment was the “fuse” to medical disputes. Conclusion: Tertiary hospitals should strengthen consciousness of prevention to medical disputes, emphasize on the service idea of participation by the patient, pay attention on the prevention to key departments and key crowds, improve the level of professional technique and the ability of communication with patients, and enhance the credibility of medical dispute mediation mechanism.