磁共振成像
磁共振成像
자공진성상
Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2015年
10期
782-786
,共5页
郭永梅%黄云海%魏新华%杨蕊梦%刘国顺%徐向东%李雪丽
郭永梅%黃雲海%魏新華%楊蕊夢%劉國順%徐嚮東%李雪麗
곽영매%황운해%위신화%양예몽%류국순%서향동%리설려
卵巢肿瘤%磁共振成像%时间-信号曲线%药代动力学%模型,统计学
卵巢腫瘤%磁共振成像%時間-信號麯線%藥代動力學%模型,統計學
란소종류%자공진성상%시간-신호곡선%약대동역학%모형,통계학
Ovarian neoplasms%Magnetic resonance imaging%Time-signal intensity curve%Pharmacokinetics%Models,Statistical
目的:探讨动态增强磁共振半定量及定量分析方法在卵巢良、恶性肿瘤中的应用价值。材料与方法收集首诊经病理证实为卵巢恶性肿瘤组17例(包括原发卵巢腺癌9例、卵巢转移腺癌6例、卵巢淋巴瘤2例),良性肿瘤或正常对照组15例(包括卵巢囊腺瘤5例、正常卵巢8例、卵巢囊肿2例)。均行3.0T 磁共振动态增强扫描,绘制时间强度曲线(time intensity curve,TIC);并使用SIEMENS TISSUE 4D软件进行图像后处理,测得感兴趣区的Ktrans、Kep、Ve值。对良、恶性组的TIC曲线及定量灌注参数值进行统计学分析。结果卵巢良、恶性组TIC曲线形态存在明显不同(P<0.05);良性组均为I型曲线(100%),恶性组中II型曲线所占比例最高(71%)。以I型曲线作为诊断良性标准,II型曲线作为诊断恶性标准,ROC曲线分析得出曲线下面积AUC为0.856。定量灌注参数值: Ktrans值分别是恶性组(0.166±0.077) min-1、良性组(0.071±0.025) min-1;Kep值分别是(0.455±0.172) min-1、(0.363±0.242) min-1;Ve值分别是(0.438±0.137)、(0.426±0.154)。恶性组平均Ktrans值比良性病变组高,且差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);恶性组与良性组的平均Kep及Ve值比较差异无有统计学意义(P=0.218、P=0.821)。结论动态增强磁共振成像方法对卵巢良、恶性肿瘤有重要的鉴别诊断价值。良性肿瘤/组织多表现为I型曲线,恶性肿瘤多表现为II型曲线。定量参数Ktrans值对卵巢良、恶性肿瘤具有重要的鉴别诊断意义。
目的:探討動態增彊磁共振半定量及定量分析方法在卵巢良、噁性腫瘤中的應用價值。材料與方法收集首診經病理證實為卵巢噁性腫瘤組17例(包括原髮卵巢腺癌9例、卵巢轉移腺癌6例、卵巢淋巴瘤2例),良性腫瘤或正常對照組15例(包括卵巢囊腺瘤5例、正常卵巢8例、卵巢囊腫2例)。均行3.0T 磁共振動態增彊掃描,繪製時間彊度麯線(time intensity curve,TIC);併使用SIEMENS TISSUE 4D軟件進行圖像後處理,測得感興趣區的Ktrans、Kep、Ve值。對良、噁性組的TIC麯線及定量灌註參數值進行統計學分析。結果卵巢良、噁性組TIC麯線形態存在明顯不同(P<0.05);良性組均為I型麯線(100%),噁性組中II型麯線所佔比例最高(71%)。以I型麯線作為診斷良性標準,II型麯線作為診斷噁性標準,ROC麯線分析得齣麯線下麵積AUC為0.856。定量灌註參數值: Ktrans值分彆是噁性組(0.166±0.077) min-1、良性組(0.071±0.025) min-1;Kep值分彆是(0.455±0.172) min-1、(0.363±0.242) min-1;Ve值分彆是(0.438±0.137)、(0.426±0.154)。噁性組平均Ktrans值比良性病變組高,且差異有統計學意義(P=0.000);噁性組與良性組的平均Kep及Ve值比較差異無有統計學意義(P=0.218、P=0.821)。結論動態增彊磁共振成像方法對卵巢良、噁性腫瘤有重要的鑒彆診斷價值。良性腫瘤/組織多錶現為I型麯線,噁性腫瘤多錶現為II型麯線。定量參數Ktrans值對卵巢良、噁性腫瘤具有重要的鑒彆診斷意義。
목적:탐토동태증강자공진반정량급정량분석방법재란소량、악성종류중적응용개치。재료여방법수집수진경병리증실위란소악성종류조17례(포괄원발란소선암9례、란소전이선암6례、란소림파류2례),량성종류혹정상대조조15례(포괄란소낭선류5례、정상란소8례、란소낭종2례)。균행3.0T 자공진동태증강소묘,회제시간강도곡선(time intensity curve,TIC);병사용SIEMENS TISSUE 4D연건진행도상후처리,측득감흥취구적Ktrans、Kep、Ve치。대량、악성조적TIC곡선급정량관주삼수치진행통계학분석。결과란소량、악성조TIC곡선형태존재명현불동(P<0.05);량성조균위I형곡선(100%),악성조중II형곡선소점비례최고(71%)。이I형곡선작위진단량성표준,II형곡선작위진단악성표준,ROC곡선분석득출곡선하면적AUC위0.856。정량관주삼수치: Ktrans치분별시악성조(0.166±0.077) min-1、량성조(0.071±0.025) min-1;Kep치분별시(0.455±0.172) min-1、(0.363±0.242) min-1;Ve치분별시(0.438±0.137)、(0.426±0.154)。악성조평균Ktrans치비량성병변조고,차차이유통계학의의(P=0.000);악성조여량성조적평균Kep급Ve치비교차이무유통계학의의(P=0.218、P=0.821)。결론동태증강자공진성상방법대란소량、악성종류유중요적감별진단개치。량성종류/조직다표현위I형곡선,악성종류다표현위II형곡선。정량삼수Ktrans치대란소량、악성종류구유중요적감별진단의의。
Objective:To evaluate the value of 3.0 T DCE-MR in diagnosing tumors of ovary.Materials and Methods:Thirty-two cases of ovarian lesions (17 were malignant, 15 were benign) were evaluated in our study. All cases were received dynamic contrast-enhanced scanning on 3.0 T MR. The raw data was processed by SIEMENS TISSUE 4D software and the signal intensity time curve (TIC) was obtained and analyzed. Pharmacokinetic modeling of Tofts with a modeled vascular input function was used for the quantitative measurements volume: transfer constant (Ktrans), reverse volume transfer constant (Kep), the extravascular extracellular space volume per unit volume of tissue (Ve). The correlation of these measurements at each groups were investigated. Compare TIC curve and the data of perfusion parameters of each groups.Results:Among 17 malignant tumors, 9 were cystadenocarcinoma and 6 were metastatic adenocarcinoma, 2 were lymphoma. 15 benign lesions included 5 cystadenomas, 8 normal ovaries and 2 ovarian cysts. 100% cases of benign lesions belong to Type I curve and 71% cases of malignant tumors belong to Type II curve. There was statistically significant difference in TIC curve between benign and malignant groups (P<0.05). If Type I curve was used as diagnostic criteria for benign and Type II for malignant, ROC resulted the AUC was 0.856. The mean value of perfusion parameters of the two groups were: Ktrans was (0.166±0.077) min-1 in malignant group and (0.071±0.025)min-1 in benign group, Kep was(0.455±0.172)min-1 in malignant group and (0.363±0.242) min-1 in benign group. Ve was(0.438±0.137) in malignant and (0.426±0.154)in benign group. Ktrans was signiifcantly difference between the malignant group and benign group(P=0.000).Conclusion:The Types of TIC and Ktrans value were important criterion in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian tumors in dynamic enhanced MR imaging. These parameters were important supplement for conventional morphology MR diagnosis.