CAJ | 학술논문

[目的]观察乳果糖口服液在结肠镜检查前肠道清洁准备中的疗效。[方法]入选需行电子结肠镜检查的患者117例，按肠道清洁药物随机分为复方聚乙二醇电解质散组、乳果糖口服液组，观察结肠镜检查前肠道准备的情况。[结果]乳果糖口服液组肠腔清洁度、患者接受程度均优于复方聚乙二醇电解质散组（均 P＜0.05）；2组均未出现严重的不良反应。[结论]乳果糖口服液在肠道准备疗效优于复方聚乙二醇电解质散。
[목적]관찰유과당구복액재결장경검사전장도청길준비중적료효。[방법]입선수행전자결장경검사적환자117례，안장도청길약물수궤분위복방취을이순전해질산조、유과당구복액조，관찰결장경검사전장도준비적정황。[결과]유과당구복액조장강청길도、환자접수정도균우우복방취을이순전해질산조（균 P＜0.05）；2조균미출현엄중적불량반응。[결론]유과당구복액재장도준비료효우우복방취을이순전해질산。
Objective]To compare polyethylene glycol(PEG) and lactulose oral solution in bowel clean‐ing preparation before colonoscopy in old patients.[Methods]Total 117 patients were chosen from April 2014 to July 2014.Fifty seven patients prepared with PEG(25 women and 32 men ,mean age [60.5 ± 15.0] years)and sixty patients with lactulose oral solution(28 women and 32 men ,mean age [64.0 ± 14.1] years) were included.We investigated the quality of bowl preparation and presence of the adverse events during bowel preparation.[Results]There was no relationship between the bowel cleaning and age(P> 0.05) . Cleanliness achieved with lactulose oral solution was better than that with PEG(t=7.54 ,P<0.05) .How‐ever ,the difference of side effect in two groups were not significant(P>0.05).[Conclusion]Bowel cleans‐ing prior to colonoscopy with lactulose oral solution groups is better than that with PEG.There are no se‐vere side effects in both groups.