临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
2015年
5期
539-543
,共5页
腰椎滑脱%峡部裂%椎弓根钉%三角骨%定位
腰椎滑脫%峽部裂%椎弓根釘%三角骨%定位
요추활탈%협부렬%추궁근정%삼각골%정위
lumbar spondylolisthesis%spondylolysis%pedicle screw%trianqular bone%location
目的:探寻一种简单、准确、可靠的峡部裂椎体椎弓根入点定位方法。方法研究分为两个阶段:①2008年1月~2012年1月,对60例峡部裂伴椎体滑脱患者应用CT测量峡部裂椎体椎弓根中轴线至三角骨下边的距离及其至三角骨内下角顶点的距离;对其中30例患者行手术治疗,术中在C臂机下找出峡部裂椎体椎弓根标准入点,测量峡部裂椎体椎弓根中轴线至三角骨下边的距离及其至三角骨内下角顶点间的距离。②2012年2月~2014年1月,将60例峡部裂伴腰椎滑脱的患者,分别采用三角骨定位法置钉(A组,n=30)和AO法置钉(B组,n=30),两组患者术前资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对比两组手术时间、手术出血量及术后的疼痛评分,手术后应用X线和CT检查验证置钉效果。结果进钉点位于三角骨面内、靠下方,大约在内下角下1/3分界线上下的区域内,距离内下角顶点4~7 mm,距离下边3~6 mm,在进针方向上,入点越靠外侧,钉尾外倾角度越大,入点越靠上方,钉尾头倾角度越大。对比两种方法手术结果,A组明显优于B组(P<0.05)。结论三角骨内下角及下边无明显增生,骨面清晰明确,面积小,位置恒定。应用该定位方法置钉,操作简单、可靠、创伤小、出血少,可明显提高一次性置钉率及置钉优良率,缩短手术时间。
目的:探尋一種簡單、準確、可靠的峽部裂椎體椎弓根入點定位方法。方法研究分為兩箇階段:①2008年1月~2012年1月,對60例峽部裂伴椎體滑脫患者應用CT測量峽部裂椎體椎弓根中軸線至三角骨下邊的距離及其至三角骨內下角頂點的距離;對其中30例患者行手術治療,術中在C臂機下找齣峽部裂椎體椎弓根標準入點,測量峽部裂椎體椎弓根中軸線至三角骨下邊的距離及其至三角骨內下角頂點間的距離。②2012年2月~2014年1月,將60例峽部裂伴腰椎滑脫的患者,分彆採用三角骨定位法置釘(A組,n=30)和AO法置釘(B組,n=30),兩組患者術前資料比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。對比兩組手術時間、手術齣血量及術後的疼痛評分,手術後應用X線和CT檢查驗證置釘效果。結果進釘點位于三角骨麵內、靠下方,大約在內下角下1/3分界線上下的區域內,距離內下角頂點4~7 mm,距離下邊3~6 mm,在進針方嚮上,入點越靠外側,釘尾外傾角度越大,入點越靠上方,釘尾頭傾角度越大。對比兩種方法手術結果,A組明顯優于B組(P<0.05)。結論三角骨內下角及下邊無明顯增生,骨麵清晰明確,麵積小,位置恆定。應用該定位方法置釘,操作簡單、可靠、創傷小、齣血少,可明顯提高一次性置釘率及置釘優良率,縮短手術時間。
목적:탐심일충간단、준학、가고적협부렬추체추궁근입점정위방법。방법연구분위량개계단:①2008년1월~2012년1월,대60례협부렬반추체활탈환자응용CT측량협부렬추체추궁근중축선지삼각골하변적거리급기지삼각골내하각정점적거리;대기중30례환자행수술치료,술중재C비궤하조출협부렬추체추궁근표준입점,측량협부렬추체추궁근중축선지삼각골하변적거리급기지삼각골내하각정점간적거리。②2012년2월~2014년1월,장60례협부렬반요추활탈적환자,분별채용삼각골정위법치정(A조,n=30)화AO법치정(B조,n=30),량조환자술전자료비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。대비량조수술시간、수술출혈량급술후적동통평분,수술후응용X선화CT검사험증치정효과。결과진정점위우삼각골면내、고하방,대약재내하각하1/3분계선상하적구역내,거리내하각정점4~7 mm,거리하변3~6 mm,재진침방향상,입점월고외측,정미외경각도월대,입점월고상방,정미두경각도월대。대비량충방법수술결과,A조명현우우B조(P<0.05)。결론삼각골내하각급하변무명현증생,골면청석명학,면적소,위치항정。응용해정위방법치정,조작간단、가고、창상소、출혈소,가명현제고일차성치정솔급치정우량솔,축단수술시간。
Objective To search for a simple, accurate and reliable positioning method of positioning spondylolysis vertebra pedicle screw, and to evaluate the effect. Methods Research methods were divided into two stages: ①Frome January 2008 to January 2012, the distance between spondylolysis vertebral pedicle axis with lower boundary of triangular bone and the distance between spondylolysis vertebral pedicle axis with annulus inferior and medial oftrian-gular bones was measured by CT for 60 paitiens. In the same period, the distance between spondylolysis vertebral pedicle axis with lower annulus inferior and medial of triangular bone was measured by C arm X-ray in operations for 30 paitiens. ②From February 2012 to January 2014, patients with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine were divided into two groups(group A,n=30; group B,n=30). Respectively,this method and AO method were used to locate the point into the vertebral pedicle. Nailing effect was evaluated by X-ray and CT after the opera-tions. Operation time, blood loss and accuracy rate of locate pedicle were recorded;Then a comparison between the AO method and the new method was made. Results The entry point was located in the lower part of the triangular bone surface. It was about on the inferior trisectrix of interior-inferior angle of triangular bone. The distance was 3~6mm between the interior-inferior angle and the entry point. The distance was 4~7mm between the lower boundary and the entry point. About the direction of the needle, when the entry point was on the outside that the camber angle of the nail end was bigger, when the entry point was on the above that the tail angle of the nail end was bigger. It was found that group A was better than group B by comparing the results of the two methods(P<0. 05). Conclusions Triangular bone is clear. Its area is small. And it′s position is constant. The new method is simple, reliable, small trauma, less bleeding and less muscle damage. This method significantly increases the rate of one-time nailing and shortens operation time.